To: Rastus
I don't think she deserved to be attacked. The funny thing is, if it had been a male teacher with an underage girl, I might be inclined to think he did.You're just being rational is all.
The conservative version of being PC is pretending that there is no difference between a man seducing an underage girl, and a boy being seduced by an attractive adult woman.
Sorry, folks--there is a difference, any straight male knows it, and getting on one's high horse and pretending there isn't doesn't change that.
To: Darkwolf377
Obviously, someone in this boy's life felt that her actions were heinous enough to insist upon prosecution and to attack her in this home. It isn't merely PC- the boy's parents see her as a child molester and a predator. If anything, the old double standard makes it worse when female teachers seduce their male students because all of those hormones make them more vulnerable.
13 posted on
07/04/2006 12:41:37 AM PDT by
LWalk18
To: Darkwolf377; Rastus
Hi All-
The actions of the teacher are reprehensible and she needs to be punished by the courts. Darkwolf377 is 100% correct in how the crime impacts a teenaged girl as compared to a teenaged boy are entirely different. This young male will be fine and won't suffer ill effects from having had sex with his attractive teacher. The person/people who violently attacked her in her home should be caught and prosecuted.
~ Blue Jays ~
22 posted on
07/04/2006 1:29:52 AM PDT by
Blue Jays
(Rock Hard, Ride Free)
To: Darkwolf377
The conservative version of being PC is pretending that there is no difference between a man seducing an underage girl, and a boy being seduced by an attractive adult woman. Sorry, folks--there is a difference, any straight male knows it, and getting on one's high horse and pretending there isn't doesn't change that.
Rational thought like this based on reality cannot be tolerated.
28 posted on
07/04/2006 2:09:56 AM PDT by
Einigkeit_Recht_Freiheit
(FReeple: Those Freepers who insist on repeating GOP talking points rather than thinking.)
To: Darkwolf377
The conservative version of being PC is pretending that there is no difference between a man seducing an underage girl, and a boy being seduced by an attractive adult woman.You are so right. The two "assaults" are more different than they are alike. The boy needs to .......... well you know.
37 posted on
07/04/2006 2:52:07 AM PDT by
beyond the sea
(Scientists Are Itching to Blame Poison Ivy's Effect on Global Warming)
To: Darkwolf377
Yes, darkwolf377. The testosterone urges in a young male are very different from a female's of the same age.
But in truth, it matters not whether an adult male or female is taking advantage of the young. This is predatory behavior. And damned wrong.
I think an adult (male or female) taking sexual advantage of an underage male is WORSE. An adult predator KNOWS about those urges, how strong they can be and instead of encouraging the young male to learn to temper those urges, the predator preys, and encourages that youth to also be a sexual predator one day..
Without male predators, the feminists have few causes. Watch the feminists support the beaten abuser, in this case, via one of their "sister" coalition groups.
It's all about money to them. It's always been about money to them.
48 posted on
07/04/2006 5:23:13 AM PDT by
Alia
To: Darkwolf377
The conservative version of being PC is pretending that there is no difference between a man seducing an underage girl, and a boy being seduced by an attractive adult woman. Just to clarify, I couldn't agree more. I can't believe the flak you're taking on this thread.
To: Darkwolf377
Just can't change Johnny Appleseed into Mother Earth.
87 posted on
07/04/2006 7:32:51 AM PDT by
Old Professer
(The critic writes with rapier pen, dips it twice, and writes again.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson