Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Book Report: Variable Star, the Controversial New "Heinlein" Novel
The Interocitor ^ | Robert A. Heinlein

Posted on 06/23/2006 10:43:25 PM PDT by narses

This is presumably the last book in Heinlein's Future History, taking place during the late Coventry period (circa Methuselah's Children or late 23rd Century). Heinlein completed a detailed outline and partial draft of this book in 1955 and then abandoned it to work on other projects. Recently, the estate arranged for Spider Robinson to complete the work. Without giving anything away, this story would have taken the History in another direction from the body of his published work.

On all but one page, Spider Robinson has done a great job here of channelling the Master, and for the most part this book is extremely well done, both in the style and flavor of late 50's Heinlein, and in the way it winds itself into the Future History canon. I recommend it for all Heinlein fans. But...

Alas, that one page. Mr. Robinson has big issues with the War and couldn't resist an extremely cheap and gratuitous shot at George Bush. Judging by nearly everything he wrote, and particularly his dislike of pacifism, Heinlein would never have allowed such a rant in a book he co-wrote. But, being 20 years dead, all he can do is spin.

Except for this unforced error, I'd give it four stars. Maybe between the galleys and the bookstores someone will have enough respect for Heinlein to not put factually challenged rants in his mouth. One would hope.

(the rant, with a mild spoiler appears below the fold)

A character is speaking about the group's shock and dismay over a large and murderous attack (pp 263-264 of the uncorrected proof), trying to talk them out of hasty action. This is couched in the timeline of Heinlein's Future History, but it's not exactly rocket science to figure out the context. Nehemiah Scudder (The Prophet) is an American Christian theocratic dictator in the canon, overthrown at great cost.

"I will offer only a single example: the Terror Wars that led inexorably to the Ascension of the Prophet.

"Shortly after Captain Leslie LeCroix returned home safely from the historic first voyage to Luna, fanatical extremist Muslims from a tiny nation committed a great atrocity against a Christian superpower. Suicide terrorists managed to horribly murder thousands of innocent civilians. The grief and rage of their surviving compatriots must have been at least comparable to what we all feel now.

"Intelligently applied, that much national will and economic force could easily have eliminated every such fanatic from the globe. At that time there were probably less than a hundred that rabid, and by definition they were so profoundly stupid or deranged as to be barely functional. It was always clear their primitive atrocity had succeeded so spectacularly only by the most evil luck.

"We all know what the superpower chose to do instead. It crushed two tiny bystander nations, killing some dozens of actual terrorists, and hundreds of thousands of civilians as innocent as their own dead loved ones had been. The first time it was suggested that nation's leaders had perhaps known about the terror plot and failed to give warning. The second invasion didn't even bother with an excuse, even though that nation had been famously hostile to terrorists. Both nations were Muslim, as the nineteen killers had been: that was enough. The nation nearly all of them had actually come from remained, inexplicably, the Christian superpower's almost only Muslim ally in that region.

'The generation of a large planetary web of enraged Muslim extremists was so inevitable it is difficult for us now to conceive of the minds that did it. They were some of the most intelligent and humane people in the history of the planet: what could they have been thinking?

"Of course they were not. They were feeling.

'They were a superpower, and monotheist. No one had ever hurt them remotely that badly, and they were utterly certain no one had any right to hurt them at all. They reverted to tribal primate behavior. Beaten and robbed of your banana by a bigger ape or a more clever chimp ... you find some smaller, stupider primate, beat him, and steal his banana.

"So doing, they ignited a global religious war that threatened to literally return the whole world to barbarism. The only thing to do then was crush it under the iron and silicon heel of a slightly smarter barbarism, a marginally less bloodstained religion, the best of all possible tyrannies. Nehemiah Scudder became the Holy Prophet of the Lord, smote the false prophets, and darkness fell."

Contrast this with actual Heinlein (Notebooks of Lazarus Long):

Those who refuse to support and defend a state have no claim to protection by that state. Killing an anarchist or a pacifist should not be defined as "murder" in a legalistic sense. The offense against the state, if any, should be "Using deadly weapons inside city limits," or "Creating a traffic hazard," or "Endangering bystanders," or other such misdemeanor.


TOPICS: Books/Literature
KEYWORDS: bookreview; heinlein; scifi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last
To: Spktyr

I grew up reading Heinlein. His future history series no doubt had am impact on my world view...back in the late 60s...


21 posted on 06/24/2006 12:24:15 AM PDT by Knitting A Conundrum (Act Justly, Love Mercy, and Walk Humbly With God Micah 6:8)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Knitting A Conundrum

I'm much younger, but I grew up in a public library. Heinlein was one of many favorite writers.

Like many others, I found that 9/11 focused my worldview - and that it was very Heinleinian in outlook.


22 posted on 06/24/2006 12:30:10 AM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: narses
The sad thing is, Spider Robinson wrote the following in an essay entitled "Rah, Rah, R.A.H.!": "Can there really be people so naive as to think that their way of life would survive the magic disappearance of their armed forces by as much as a month? Evidently; I meet 'em all over." And this: "...Unlike Lazarus, Heinlein loves the United States of America. He'll tell you why, quite specifically, in this book. Logical, pragmatic reasons why. He will tell you, for instance, of his travels in the Soviet Union, and what he saw and heard there. If, after you've heard him out, you still don't think that for all its warts (hell, running sores), the United States is the planet's best hope for an enlightened future, there's no sense in us talking further; you'll be wanting to pack. (Hey, have you heard? The current government of the People's republic of China [half-life unknown] has allowed as to how limited freedom of thought will be permitted this year? Provisionally.)" And this, when listing the most popular charges against Heinlein's politics, on him being right wing: "And even if there were anything to the allegation, when exactly was it that the conservaive viewpoint was proven unfit for literary consumption? I missed it."

Spider apparenty doesn't remember his own words.

23 posted on 06/24/2006 12:44:08 AM PDT by WestVirginiaRebel (Common sense will do to liberalism what the atomic bomb did to Nagasaki-Rush Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses

This reminds me of "Black Coffee," an Agatha Christie stage play which was turned into a novel by Charles Osborne. It features Hercule Poriot and Hastings but is so lacking in the original Christie style that it seemed a terrible waste of time to read it. I understand that it was almost slavishly devoted to the play's original dialogue and stage direction. What was missing was the Christie flair. What I so like about Christie are the laugh-out-loud moments. She could take an observation of human behavior or foible and craft a sentence which so piqantly described it, that one could not help but audibly laugh.


24 posted on 06/24/2006 12:50:09 AM PDT by Socratic ("I'll have the roast duck with the mango salsa.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
I hate this recent practice of resurrecting dead novelists anyway.

Thrones, Dominations, Jill Paton Walsh's finishing up of Dorothy L. Sayers last Peter Wimsey novel, is an exception, except for two unfortunate word choices. But basically you're right: resurrecting dead novelists' dead novels doesn't work.

25 posted on 06/24/2006 4:56:01 AM PDT by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: narses

Spider IMO jumped the shark a long time ago.


26 posted on 06/24/2006 5:03:18 AM PDT by Tijeras_Slim
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
I refuse to read anything but the genuine author.


27 posted on 06/24/2006 5:15:37 AM PDT by usmcobra (A single rogue Marine, yeah that can happen, but a whole Unit, only a liberal would believe that BS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses
I of course will read it, The Lazarus Long quote is one I have used many times.
28 posted on 06/24/2006 5:16:21 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dsc
Glory Road was the worst novel Robert A. Heinlein wrote as he skipped from writing SF into writing Fantasy.
29 posted on 06/24/2006 5:20:41 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran ("Remember the Alamo, Goliad and WACO, It is Time for a new San Jacinto")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
A writer with a distinct, individual style wouldn't be spending his time mimicking someone else.

I dunno...Todd McCaffrey seems to pull off Anne McCaffrey's _Pern_ very well, at least from the two stories I've seen so far.

Some of the best of MZB's _Darkover_ books were the ones released a few years after she died, co-written by Deborah Ross from MZB's notes and outlines. The style is like the best of MZB. I've even seen a fanfic written by a random nobody who likewise picked up her style perfectly.

Really, for me a co-author or fanfic author is judged on how closely they can pull off the original author's style...it really becomes a part of the way the world itself is presented, at least for the worlds I know best.

Roleplays are another extension of this. Bending canon a little is one thing...female blueriders in Pern, for example...but when roleplayers "rush" the story or completely trash any feel of it being canon Pern, that ruins it for me.

30 posted on 06/24/2006 5:27:18 AM PDT by Fire_on_High (I am so proud of what we were...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: narses

I'm always amazed when I discover how many Heinlien fans there really are. I think I've read everything he ever wrote, but I have never met a single person who even heard of him.

Yet every time his name is mentioned in a site like this, lots of people know even more about the writer than I do.

Incidentally, "Starship Troopers" was filmed in Wyoming, not far from where I lived -- A friend of mine was one of the extras behind the white masks.

Also incidental -- if the heinlien family was willing to sign off on the movie, I'm guessing they won't mind a ghost writer doing a work-up on some old notes.


31 posted on 06/24/2006 6:42:50 AM PDT by 9999lakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Thanks for the link, good read.


32 posted on 06/24/2006 7:22:35 AM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Dallas59

I might but Spider's bull will have to be skipped so that I can try to enjoy it.


33 posted on 06/24/2006 7:23:12 AM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Spktyr

"They did a fairly good job with Puppet Masters - but it got crushed by the premiere of Stargate at the box office."

It wasn't as bad as it could have been, but a couple of minor, no-cost tweaks could have made it much better.


34 posted on 06/24/2006 7:27:35 AM PDT by dsc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: 9999lakes
"Starship Troopers" was filmed in Wyoming, not far from where I lived

You lived near Hell's Half Acre?  Cool. 

I visited there as a child several times.  I have family still in Riverton, where my Grandparents homesteaded, as well as family in Dubois. 

I love Wyoming.  I've always said I would love to live there... as long as I knew I didn't have to live there.  I'd probably never want to leave, but the idea of not being able to if I wanted to might drive me a bit nuts. <g>

35 posted on 06/24/2006 7:56:14 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: narses
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects.

Robert A Heinlein

I would say that, based on this example of his talent, Spider Robinson is appropriately named (arachnids are close enough to insects to make the point).

36 posted on 06/24/2006 7:58:29 AM PDT by Phsstpok (Often wrong, but never in doubt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narses; GatorGirl; maryz; afraidfortherepublic; Antoninus; Aquinasfan; livius; goldenstategirl; ...

Any Catholic Heinlein fans? Any thoughts on his books, his life and how they relate to our current culture?


37 posted on 06/24/2006 2:31:47 PM PDT by narses (St Thomas says “lex injusta non obligat”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lawdave

Because of a long ago reply to me, I thought you might want to see this topic. :')

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/653287/posts?page=88#88


38 posted on 06/25/2006 1:50:33 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Wednesday, June 21, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard
Great reference. If Heinlein "abandoned it", hre did so because he didn't like it. I hate this recent practice of resurrecting dead novelists anyway.

That's why I refuse to read the new Dune books written by Frank Herbert's son. The original Dune blew my impressionable young mind out of the water, but I admit many of the later original ones sucked. I know the new ones would probably just annoy me at best.
39 posted on 06/26/2006 9:31:02 AM PDT by DarkSavant (Grease me up woman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

see message 38 in this thread.


40 posted on 08/21/2006 10:14:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (updated my FR profile on Thursday, August 10, 2006. https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-40 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson