To: Sacajaweau
The reason is simple... The SANE nurse is a material witness, whose identity is currently unknown to the defense. This individual's conclusions have been used to justify this witch hunt, but the person is not now subject to questioning.
If the prosecution wants to have this nurse as an "expert witness", then the defense gets to know who they are - if only because the person's identity will reveal the experience and expertise they do or do not hold.
71 posted on
06/22/2006 7:13:09 AM PDT by
MortMan
(Trains stop at train stations. On my desk is a workstation...)
To: MortMan
I think we do know who the SANE nurse it. Wasn't there released some time ago a list of experts that Nifong planned on calling at trial? There were two from DUMC that we presumed were the medical personnel who did the exam. I remember commenting on the woman, forget her name now, and the fact that her undergraduate degree was in "women's studies". No pro-rape bias there.
To: All
In case you missed this:
Regarding Brodhead and his pattern of behavior re: accused innocents, here are 2 articles that should enlighten anyone. "Forget the Facts", is the 1st link in the article. Be sure to read it...it's is specifically about Brodhead.
A Yale Murder
To: MortMan
If the prosecution wants to have this nurse as an "expert witness", then the defense gets to know who they are - if only because the person's identity will reveal the experience and expertise they do or do not hold. Some curly haired male Nifong mouthpiece from Durham said Nifong doesn't have to reveal his witness list till trial.
79 posted on
06/22/2006 7:26:52 AM PDT by
pepperhead
(Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson