To: Mike Nifong; All
One thing is troubling me and I can't remember it clearly.
Did LIEfong say that Gottlieb, Himan, and himself met with CGM but it wasn't related to the case, therefore there are no notes of this conversation???
Did I hear that correctly? If so, that is absurd on its face. All three of them need to be put under oath.
505 posted on
06/22/2006 1:49:17 PM PDT by
Carling
(It's Danny, Sir)
To: Carling
Nifong says that's attorney work product and therefore priveleged. I think.
506 posted on
06/22/2006 1:50:13 PM PDT by
abb
(If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
To: Carling
Did LIEfong say that Gottlieb, Himan, and himself met with CGM but it wasn't related to the case, therefore there are no notes of this conversation???
Did I hear that correctly? If so, that is absurd on its face. All three of them need to be put under oath.
My guess is that Nifong is claiming they discussed strategy not evidence. Strategy is not discoverable. Evidence like asking her about the details of her story is discoverable.
As the defense attorney said, there is little doubt they discussed her story.
565 posted on
06/22/2006 2:49:19 PM PDT by
JLS
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson