Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DA plans to turn over more papers in lacrosse case (DukeLax)
The Herald-Sun ^ | June 22, 2006 | John Stevenson

Posted on 06/22/2006 2:23:47 AM PDT by abb

DURHAM -- District Attorney Mike Nifong plans to give defense lawyers at least 300 additional pages of information about the Duke University lacrosse rape case, adding to 1,298 pages of documentation surrendered previously.

Without describing their contents, Nifong said the new documents would be handed over during a preliminary hearing today for three recently indicted lacrosse players: Collin Finnerty, Reade Seligmann and David Evans.

The three are accused of raping, sodomizing and restraining an exotic dancer in a bathroom during an off-campus party at 610 N. Buchanan Blvd. in mid-March.

All are free under $400,000 bonds as they await a trial that, according to Nifong, might begin next spring.

None is expected to attend today's hearing.

In addition to a transfer of documents, the hearing will include a request from Seligmann's lawyers that his bond be lowered to roughly one-tenth its current level. The lawyers filed an affidavit in support of that request Wednesday.

Signed by Philip Seligmann, the defendant's father, the affidavit said that Seligmann had been recruited by every Ivy League university to play football or lacrosse, and that he accepted a 90-percent scholarship to be on the Duke lacrosse team.

"This case has taken an unbelievable and horrendous emotional toll on all my family, especially my wife," the elder Seligmann wrote. "We are committed as a family, along with Reade, to do everything necessary to restore our good name."

According to the affidavit, Seligmann's bail money was provided by a family friend whose "loss of income is substantial" as a result.

In a related matter, the News and Observer Publishing Co. moved Wednesday to make public certain documents -- reportedly pertaining to the alleged rape victim's medical records -- that were filed by defense lawyers under seal.

"In this case, the fact that there are charges of sexual assault is unfortunate and controversial -- either because a woman has been sexually violated or because the defendants have been wrongfully accused -- but neither is a justification for sealing a court proceeding," a lawyer for the newspaper wrote.

The lawyer, Hugh Stevens, also said the sealed documents raised questions about Nifong's handling of the case. He said that when the conduct of public officials is at issue, it is an added reason for making the pertinent files public.

Meanwhile, several defense lawyers predicted Wednesday that Nifong's latest 300-plus pages of documentation would do little to help him, since earlier paperwork -- in their view -- was more beneficial to the defense than the prosecution.

For example, attorneys Joe Cheshire and Brad Bannon have said the earlier documents showed a "very significant and disturbing deficiency" in Nifong's evidence.

Specifically, there were indications that Nifong began making public statements about the accuser's medical records even before they were in his possession, according to the two lawyers, who represent Evans.

Cheshire and Bannon said the District Attorney's Office subpoenaed the accuser's medical files from Duke Hospital on March 20 -- six days after the alleged rape.

However, the files were not printed out in compliance with the subpoena until March 30, and Police Investigator Benjamin Himan didn't pick them up until April 5, Cheshire and Bannon wrote in court paperwork last week.

But the lawyers said Nifong told a local television station on March 27 that he had no doubt the exotic dancer was raped, based on a "personal review" of her medical records. They quoted the district attorney as saying, "My reading of the report of the emergency room nurse would indicate that some type of sexual assault did in fact take place."

Citing the 1,298 pages of documentation given them by Nifong earlier, various defense lawyers also have contended there were numerous inconsistencies in the accuser's version of events, along with unacceptable omissions in a sworn affidavit prepared by police. The affidavit was used by Himan to obtain judicial permission for his evidence-gathering efforts.

Among other things, Himan failed to mention that a co-dancer had described the rape allegation as "a crock," even though she was with the accuser for all but about five minutes on the night in question, according to defense lawyers.

Nifong has bristled at that and other defense characterizations of his evidence, while attacking the national press corps for -- in his opinion -- blindly reporting the characterizations without checking their accuracy.

"Is anyone surprised that the defense attorneys are spinning this case in such a way that things do not look good for the prosecution?" Nifong wrote in an e-mail to Newsweek magazine last week.

"Their job, after all, is to create reasonable doubt, a task made all the easier by an uncritical national press corps desperate for any reportable detail, regardless of its veracity," the district attorney said.

The e-mail traffic was made public by Nifong on Monday.

URL for this article: http://www.herald-sun.com/durham/4-746370.html


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; nifong
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,061-2,065 next last
To: ltc8k6
Titus appears to be up for re-election this year.

Groan.....

Not good........

561 posted on 06/22/2006 2:40:35 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07

I wonder if things starting looking bad for the Rats in North Carolina if they would put pressure on Nifong or some judge to end this.


562 posted on 06/22/2006 2:43:21 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Mike Nifong

*Sh*t* That's "just us" for ya. I thought CA was bad, but this is insane. Is Judge Hudson up for reelection?

I guess we need to start FReeping hard. Seems like it's the only way to get anything done...


563 posted on 06/22/2006 2:47:00 PM PDT by TheSpottedOwl (If you don't understand the word "Illegal", then the public school system has failed you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Not sure if I ever posted the exact same hypothesis, but I sure thought about it. But it has to come from the grass roots Dems. "How can I support a party that supports this?" type of thing. Should I write a letter to the Move-On folks??? :)


564 posted on 06/22/2006 2:48:45 PM PDT by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: Carling
Did LIEfong say that Gottlieb, Himan, and himself met with CGM but it wasn't related to the case, therefore there are no notes of this conversation???

Did I hear that correctly? If so, that is absurd on its face. All three of them need to be put under oath.


My guess is that Nifong is claiming they discussed strategy not evidence. Strategy is not discoverable. Evidence like asking her about the details of her story is discoverable.

As the defense attorney said, there is little doubt they discussed her story.
565 posted on 06/22/2006 2:49:19 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 505 | View Replies]

To: Dukie07
Right it has to be the democrats that put the pressure on. It has to happen both in the polls and in campaign contributions. Angry republicans mean nothing to rats.
566 posted on 06/22/2006 2:50:49 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau; Mike Nifong; maggief; All

About cousin Jakki (from CTV message board)

http://wilmingtonjournal.blackpress...sID=70514&sID=4

The cousin of the alleged victim in the Duke University lacrosse rape case says “alums of Duke” quietly offered the accuser lots of money - a staggering $2 million – early on to drop the charges, and go on with her life


567 posted on 06/22/2006 2:52:37 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

BAD LINK above
http://www.wilmingtonjournal.com/News/default.asp

click link below


568 posted on 06/22/2006 2:54:26 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Precisely, and with the agenda so warped on the side of the "ists" (i.e. feminists, legalists, whateverists) you will be hard-pressed to find a Democrat of substantive clout who's willing to step up to the plate. I wish I could reach everyone to let them know this isn't a Democrat or Republican issue -- it's an American issue.


569 posted on 06/22/2006 2:54:41 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Link doesn't work but I don't believe it. Precious may be crazy but she's not stupid.


570 posted on 06/22/2006 2:54:46 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

LOL, yeah sure. Offer money to a whore and she don't take it. Yeah, uh huh.


571 posted on 06/22/2006 2:55:24 PM PDT by abb (If it Ain't Posted on FreeRepublic, it Ain't News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Good summary, what the defense accomplished was:

1. Nailing down no tox report.

2. No missing pages of the SANE report will show up.

3. No surprise from Durham Access.

4. Bond reduction.

What they failed to get:

A. An order that Nifong certify he has read the file.

B. An order that Nifong and the police write down what they discussed in some meetings.

I still maintain this was a vast improvement. I did not expect Stephens to publically slap down Nifong. Nifong certifying he had read the entire file would take away one line of defense for him in follow up civil and criminal actions. The judge was not going to do that.


572 posted on 06/22/2006 2:55:34 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 519 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Titus was elected in 2002 and serves an 8 yr. term.

http://www.nccourts.org/County/Durham/Staff/Superior.asp


573 posted on 06/22/2006 2:57:28 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Big mistake. Now you know that this isn't going to go away quietly or reasonably. There's something buried deep here and it still smells rotten.


574 posted on 06/22/2006 2:57:51 PM PDT by Constitutions Grandchild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: abb
That's about it. CourtHouse Crowd trying to drag it out hoping it will go away, or the defense will get tired of paying money to lawyers and then will settle for something...

It is all about reducing criminal and civil liability for Nifong now. If he could get these guys to plea to jaywalking, it would help him out.
575 posted on 06/22/2006 3:00:09 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 524 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

568 has the good link

BTW Jakki managed to get in she was an actress and stand-up comedian


576 posted on 06/22/2006 3:01:52 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: JLS

That was my take too. I thought Stephens was fair, and his demeanor was so much better. The defense attorneys all seemed calm, confident, and well-prepared. Nifong seemed nervous, and somewhat cowed compared to his strutting and smirking last time. Himan seemed clueless, and appeared dressed for a lacrosse game.


577 posted on 06/22/2006 3:02:17 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: GAgal

Great!

I am seldom happy I am wrong.

I am so glad to be wrong in this case.


578 posted on 06/22/2006 3:03:32 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
I read it from the repaired link. What kind of family sends out a cross dresser (and who knows what else) to be their national spokesman, er... spokeswoman, er..., er...
579 posted on 06/22/2006 3:03:44 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

So now they are accusing people of felonies?

Did they tell Nifong that folks are trying to influence his witnesses?


580 posted on 06/22/2006 3:05:16 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 568 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 2,061-2,065 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson