Posted on 06/21/2006 4:16:39 AM PDT by Man50D
Author Jerome Corsi filed a Freedom of Information Act request yesterday asking for full disclosure of the activities of an office implementing a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that apparently could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
As WorldNetDaily reported, the White House has established working groups, under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.
Tancredo wants to know the membership of the SPP groups along with their various trilateral memoranda of understanding and other agreements reached with counterparts in Mexico and Canada.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
Well it's about time!. I'm ready for the New World Order. And where's my microchip while there at it? /sarc
This will effect the lives of all Americans. I see no reason why this information should not be disclosed. Especially since it bypasses normal checks and balances of our government.
I would thing that sooner or later it will have to pass muster.
I sent a FOIA request back in October 2005 to the State Department seeking all documents pertinent to the Mexican Customs Facility to be built in Kansas City, MO. I received a letter from state on December 28, 2005 saying they were gathering the information. There has been no communication from the State Department since then other than calling once a month to a number provided for my status. I hope Corsi is more successful.
The constitution gives the president the right to negotiate treaties. It only gives congress the right to approve or reject a treaty once it has been negotiated by the president.
I have no idea about what is being negotiated or even if something is being negotiated. However this is just one om many stores from World Net Daily that tries to mislead the reader. World Net Daily is contemptuous of readers and believes they are ignorant and easily mislead. Sadly they may very well be right.
If World Net Daily said the sky was blue, I would want to check before I believed them.
As long as there is a total ban on all illegals obtaining citizenship, and Mexico needs to be fixed up into becoming something other than a hellhole.
The June 12th issue of Forbes magazine covers the issue in detail.
Of course you might find that Forbes".... is contemptuous of readers and believes they are ignorant and easily mislead. Sadly they may very well be right."
Thank goodness we have someone as intelligent as you to keep us from being duped.
We live on a continent whose three countries possess the assets to make it the strongest, most prosperous and self-sufficient area on Earth. Within the borders of this North American continent are the food, resources, technology and undeveloped territory which, properly managed, could dramatically improve the quality of life of all its inhabitants.SourceIt is no accident that this unmatched potential for progress and prosperity exists in three countries with such long-standing heritages of free government. A developing closeness among Canada, Mexico and the United States--a North American accord--would permit achievement of that potential in each country beyond that which I believe any of them--strong as they are--could accomplish in the absence of such cooperation. In fact, the key to our own future security may lie in both Mexico and Canada becoming much stronger countries than they are today.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1648437/posts
Bush sneaking North American super-state without oversight?
Referring to the SPP joint declaration, the report, entitled "Building a North American Community," stated:
The Task Force is pleased to provide specific advice on how the partnership can be pursued and realized.
To that end, the Task Force proposes the creation by 2010 of a North American community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity. We propose a community based on the principle affirmed in the March 2005 Joint Statement of the three leaders that "our security and prosperity are mutually dependent and complementary." Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter within which the movement of people, products, and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe. Its goal will be to guarantee a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America.
The CFR task force report called for establishment of a common security border perimeter around North America by 2010, along with free movement of people, commerce and capital within North America, facilitated by the development of a North American Border Pass that would replace a U.S. passport for travel between the U.S., Canada and Mexico.
Also envisioned by the CFR task force report were a North American court, a North American inter-parliamentary group, a North American executive commission, a North American military defense command, a North American customs office and a North American development bank
bump
fyi
http://www.unitednorthamerica.org
a place to start.
"Also envisioned by the CFR task force report were a North American court"
Owwwwwwww, my a__ hurts.
The Nonelected Rulers
"I believe the Council on Foreign Relations and its ancillary elitist groups are indifferent to communism. They have no ideological anchors. In their pursuit of a new world order they are prepared to deal without prejudice with a communist state, a socialist state, a democratic state, monarchy, oligarchy—it’s all the same to them.
Rear Admiral Chester Ward, USN (Retd.), who was a member of the CFR for sixteen years, has written, “The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common—they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty and the national independence of the United States.” Their goal is to impose a benign stability on the quarreling family of nations through the merger and consolidation. They see the elimination of national boundaries, the suppression of racial and ethnic loyalties as the most expeditious avenue to world peace. Their rationale rests exclusively on materialism. They believe economic competition is the root cause of international tension. This approach dismisses as insignificant the form of government or the political ideology expressed by that form.
It may be that if the CFR vision of the future could be realized, there would be a reduction in wars, a lessening of poverty, a more efficient utilization of the world’s resources. To my mind, this would inevitably be accompanied by a loss of personal freedom of choice and the reestablishment of the restraints which provoked the American Revolution."
With No Apologies
Barry Goldwater
Wow.
So when will the usual smug responders start Photoshopping a tin foil hat onto Barry Goldwater? Or onto Reagan?
Great quote from Au-H2O !!!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.