There was nothing logical about this thing from the beginning.
- - - - - - -
I have never found that to be the greatest BIBLICAL justification for much of anything.
God often does many things that seem illogical to the carnal, human, fleshly mind.
I appreciate such earnest efforts on your part . . . evidently to be Biblical and edifyingly exhortive or some such.
So far, your efforts are falling very flat on these eyes. It still appears, sounds like there's more of a penchant for throwing rocks than for hearing God accurately.
There was nothing Biblical about this event either. There's no biblical pattern to support him. From the evidence, you are supporting a false prophet. Why? To a liberal, the only evil is declaring evil to be evil.
I have no problem giving credit to a true prophet. David Wilkerson's 'Vision' comes to mind. He had the ministry to back it up when he presented it. I read it when it was nearly new, and have seen his prophecies fulfilled one after another.
The scriptures are not soft on false prophets, why should we be? Jesus warned us;
"Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits."
and again He warned us that in the last days; "Then many false prophets will rise up and deceive many."
Peter warned us;
"But there were also false prophets among the people, even as there will be false teachers among you, who will secretly bring in destructive heresies," (Peter continues in 2 Peter to "cast stones" as you like to call it.)
The Apostle John warned us;
"Beloved, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits, whether they are of God; because many false prophets have gone out into the world."
Now, show me the passage that tells us to temper those warnings by giving a prophet the benefit of the doubt when he blows it big time.