Posted on 06/14/2006 1:22:02 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk
Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
Corsi and Tancredo will join Liddy for the entire 11 a.m. hour, Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.
Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.
The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.
The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.
Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."
WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.
Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.
I'm shining sunlight on you moonbats.
You nutters won't be persuaded by facts. If I were to string together a few tangentially-related conspiracies, then you'd buy that, but I just can't manage to fake it like Corsi.
How would you know?
And btw, thanks for bumping the thread.
There is nothing. Oh, sure, there are speculations as to motives and there are sentences that start with "Isn't it a coincidence that..." and a prettily-colored map, but I want it revealed who is gullible enough to fall for this huckster Corsi.
And so I bump your post.
Well, you've ignored factual post after factual post from every source under the sun...governmental, UN, commercial and every respected conservative organization you can think of, practically.
So, your ignorance is willful, and therefore without excuse.
It's the whole Newwwwwwwww World Order insanity all over again.
How do you feel about the Law of the Sea Treaty, which gives a supragovernmental UN board control over the majority of the earth's surface, and enforces UN taxes for the first time.
I know I've asked you before, but as always, you answered with insults and ad hominems, and no facts or intelligent discussion.
If this too is a figment of my imagination, perhaps you can tell me why the President thinks it's real, and supports this socialist monstrosity that we thought Reagan had sunk to the bottom of the sea, never to be seen again.
You know who you remind me of? Those who scoffed at Mein Kampf in the 1920's and 30's...
Ping me to a new thread based on a recent article on LOST and I will comment on it.
But you are skirting the issue. That is not NAU. That is not a "superstate". Sorry. This is exactly what I'm talking about.
I'd give you the dozens of links that have been provided to you previously, but you're not worth the effort. You'd just ignore them again.
Thinking FReepers simply have to go back and read the thread.
There are few recent articles on the subject. Conservative leaders put the hammer down last year, and the monstrosity is lying around dormant in the Senate somewhere, it would seem. Republican Senators are not exactly renowned for their courage, you see.
We need to do the same thing with these trade agreements that put someone's dollar interests ahead of the sovereignty of our borders and of the American people.
That's all. And I'll comment on it. I'd figure you won't post it because I don't think you can find any such article.
Sorry, your "rules" are not FR rules.
Starting new threads on the same topic is frowned upon when you have a perfectly good thread to post on.
There are hundreds of pages of documents provided right here, from sources that are highly credible in every way. You sneered at every one.
You really don't understand How a Bill Becomes a Law, do you? BTW, the Constitution gives the Senate exclusive right of ratification of treaties.
So, either you have no idea what you're talking about or the "T" in LOST doesn't stand for "treaty".
I'm betting on the former.
If it's on LOST, it has nothing to do with this NAU insanity. It's a separate issue to rational people. To conspiracy nuts, of course, it's all the same giant plan.
I'm not in the least interested in your posts, contrary to what your ego requires.
If I wanted juvenile insults and ad hominem attacks, I'd hang out on a leftist site.
Maybe you should try it. You'd feel right at home, I'm sure.
Or perhaps you already do...
Of course you are, you're proving it now.
If I wanted juvenile insults and ad hominem attacks, I'd hang out on a leftist site.
Or talk to yourself, apparently.
They're certainly cut from the same cloth...liberal elites who care nada for American sovereignty and our republican form of self-government thinking they know better than the American people what is good for us.
And you're their useful idiot, tearing good people down with your Gramscian tactics of disruption.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.