Corsi, Tancredo on Liddy to Challenge WH unauthorized work on 'North American Union'

World Net Daily ^ | June 14, 2006 | WND

[Kenny Bunk]

Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

Corsi and Tancredo will join Liddy for the entire 11 a.m. hour, Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.

Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.

The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

[jer33 3]

http://www.frbatlanta.org/publica/eco-rev/rev_abs/00er/q4/chriszt.pdf


Perspectives on a
Potential North American
Monetary Union

One factor [labor mobility] raised in this article written several years ago largely impacted the suitability of the North American monetary union. The suggested immigration policies give a new setting.

[hedgetrimmer]

Gosh and here it is within your powers to explain "working groups" to everyone, and you don't. Since taxpayers paid for your Pell grant education, don't you think you owe us the courtesy of a civil answer?

[1rudeboy]

You? No.

[sam_paine]

Exactly why would the lefty loons in Canada want to join?

Whatever happened to all the good UFO threads?

I miss the good old invaders from space days.

All of the energy has left those good pursuits and bled into CFR and Masonic conspiracy theories. There's not even a hat tip to the jews in this one.

[hedgetrimmer]

What constitutional powers authorize 'working groups'? What are they?

[sam_paine]

Amishdude: I just found it on a search.

Wow. You just "found" something by sending a request to a "search engine" on the "web".

Or, You were just "served" something (that 'they' wanted you to see) by sending a request to a "goverment search engine" on the "old DARPANet".

Ha! Worried about a secret plan for dissolution of the United States, but not at all skeptical about what your computer tells you is real.

If you were really 'aware' of the agitprop and the counter-counter-counter propanganda, then you'd be as fried as Alex Jones.

Mwuahahahaahahaaaaa.

[jer33 3]

http://www.policyalternatives.ca/documents/National_Office_Pubs/monetary_integration.pdf

North American
Monetary Integration:
Should Canada Join the
Dollarization Bandwagon?
ISBN: 0-88627-285-8 November 2002
CAW 567
OTTAWA
By Mario Seccareccia


see pages 24-27 if PDF (total 45 pages)

[Larousse2]

Thank you and others for your excellent research!

And as for the Red necks, white socks, and Blue Ribbon beer noclassatol Hebephrenics who have attacked you, I have consistently noted that they have not backed up any of their attacks with any reasearch.

My momma would say, "Red Neck, ignorant, and proud ot it!"

[texastoo]

Good post. I wonder when this article was written. I noticed "Pastor" was one of the references.

[1rudeboy]

Without doing the research (in other words--off the top of my head--please verify if you wish), I can say that Congress (namely the Senate), on its own initiative, has delegated its authority to the Executive Branch (in the name of Fast Track Authority) in exchange for oversight during the negotiating process, and periodic re-authorization of the authority itself to keep it from being abused.

I was curious myself to see if anyone has argued in court that the delegation of authority was unconstitutional, and it appears that the United Steel Workers have, to no success. Made in the U.S.A. Foundation, et al. v. United States, 242 F.3d 1300 (11th Cir. 2001)(cert. denied).

It's a long opinion, but I'm sure hedgetrimmer will be along to misrepresent it in a couple of minutes.

[1rudeboy]

I am told that Ann Coulter's latest has a chapter on liberals who try to change the tone or stifle the debate by pretending not to know the definitions of common words or terms.

[sam_paine]

It is a bit of leap to assume that this will lead to an immediate loss of sovereignty. After all, the member states of the EU still have sovereignty..... However, with the formation of a European Parliament, harmonized customs,...the establishment of the Euro, there is no doubt that many sovereign aspects of the individual European nations states have already ended, ...The United States will not be submerged by the North American Union, but it's going to get mighty wet.

Or not.

The UK took the opportunity to vote to stay out of the idiotic Euro, keep their Sterling, and keep their own border control (they actually added border control on the French side of the Chunnel.) Good move for them.

If this is the huge conspiracy ala EU-cum-USSA, then this might be a great opportunity as with the UK's opt-out from EU for some Freedom loving states like Texas and Montana to regain some of our freedoms which have been squelched by the Federal Union with Marxist Massachussetts, for example.

Maybe Texans have more in common with Coahuilans than they do with Manhattanites?

Or, this may be an overhyped conspiracy thread.

[hedgetrimmer]

liberals who try to change the tone or stifle the debate by pretending not to know the definitions of common words or terms.

Well then, that would be you, and you, and you.

[July4th64]

I agree. After seeing Bush defy the UN with regards to Iraq, it really doesn't make much sense that he would so easily toss American sovereignity.

[jer33 3]

The article's publication date is Fourth Quarter 2000.

[Rex Anderson]

Whatever happened to all the good UFO threads?

I miss the good old invaders from space days.

*LOL*
Not to worrry... I was just reading *another* NAU thread, when a poster offered up this jewel of a link:

American Concentration Camps

They're coming out of the woodwork!

[1rudeboy]

Please, please, please link me to that thread. I wonder if it's the same person/people that think the Spaniards are going to inderdict traffic on the Trans-Texas Corridor in the case of a national emergency.

[jer33 3]

http://www.iie.com/publications/papers/paper.cfm?ResearchID=491

North American Monetary and Financial Integration: Notes on the US Perspective

Edwin M. Truman
Institute for International Economics

Paper presented at a meeting of the
Study Group on North American Monetary and Financial Integration
Montreal, Canada
December 13, 2002



Snippet:
Nevertheless, the basic case for the United States to seek to formalize North American monetary and financial integration, in my view, would have to be motivated primarily by a view that in the longer term there will be and should be fewer currencies in the world and greater consistency in the structure and supervision and regulation of financial sectors around the world. In other words, a case can be made that North Americans should get out in front of these trends. However, if North Americans are to do so, the impetus, in my view, will have to come, first, from the private sector, and, second, from north and south of US borders.


Snippet:
4. Implicit in what I have said, and certainly what I believe, is that for North American monetary and financial integration to be successful, it would have to involve an elimination of all barriers to labor migration. This is likely to be seen as an economic necessity and a political difficulty.

[sam_paine]

re: American Concentration Camps

Wow. Someone still using Netscape to create web pages with annoying backgrounds!

New World Order still under planning with secret IBM Selectric Typewriters. Hey! Call Dan Rather!

Seriously, though, I like having these nutters out there. They're like curb feelers on freedom. When they start squawking, it's good to take a look...then keep driving.

[1rudeboy]

I would love to see some of the old FR concentration-camp threads. I don't think all of them were pulled, and I recall that they were far more hilarious than the contrail threads.