Corsi, Tancredo on Liddy to Challenge WH unauthorized work on 'North American Union'

World Net Daily ^ | June 14, 2006 | WND

[Kenny Bunk]

Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

Corsi and Tancredo will join Liddy for the entire 11 a.m. hour, Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.

Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.

The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.

[Smartass]

Yeah, and what's surprising is that as stated at the beginning of Kenny Bunk's thread of:

Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.
(emphasis added)

All it does is load the rotten Dems canons. Pelosi and company look for anything they can to raise an argument, and no doubt it will be here too.

 

[Smartass]

Have any of you seen this yet?

Did Hillary Clinton Attend Bilderberg Conference?
Hotel head says she was there, coupled with high security arrival of U.S. official

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison Planet.com | June 15 2006

Did New York Senator and possible 2008 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton attend this past weekend's Bilderberg meeting in Ottawa Canada? Our inside sources coupled with what witnesses saw at the Brookestreet Hotel strongly suggest this to be the case.

On Saturday, the second day of the conference, a large cadillac style amored limousine with U.S. diplomatic plates arrived at the underground parking garage of the Brookestreet Hotel festooned by police motorcycles and added security.

This extra subterfuge was not in evidence for other attendees such as David Rockerfeller and Queen Beatrix, who arrived outside the front of the building and walked straight in.

Full article:  Click Here

 

 

[Quix]

I'm sure her unroyal lowness was lobbying hard and heavy to be Queen of NORTHAM and if possible of WestHemi.

She's have tried to take over the whole meeting if she'd have thought she could have gotten away with it..

[1rudeboy]

Kinda funny, too, that every one of those websites describes (right out in the open) plans to integrate North America.

Where's the conspiracy, again?

[jer33 3]

These same issues [sovereignty, common infrastructure, common tribunals, common passports or travel documents, a single currency, and free flowing borders to facilitate migration of workers and transportation of goods] were being debated when I was still in the midst of my studies. Of course a majority of the students never thought the European Union or the Euro would become reality.

Where are we as a nation positioning ourselves now in the international arena? It would be naive to think that the Law of the Sea Treaty, the Kyoto Protocol, the role and influence of NGO's will not have an impact on our lives.

As citizens of this great nation we have a right and a privilege to participate in our government process. It is our own fault if we cower down to a few nameless, faceless individuals on FR who desire to end this healthy discussion.

Let's sift through these resources to be accurately informed... take action... let us not be a silent majority.

[Kimberly GG]

After reviewing many of your recent posts to others, on a variety of threads and topics, it is obvious to me that discussing ANYTHING with you, in your current state of mind, is clearly out of the question. I suggest you get the help you need, then we can talk.

[Kimberly GG]

"Did you ever consider the possibility that these posters you reference are involved in these little 'projects', or stand to profit from them? There are PLENTY of people out there who would GLADLY put the pursuit of profit and power ahead of their country, their Constitution, and their G-d."

You may be right. There must be SOME reason and I can think of no other logical explanation for the hostility and hatred being spewed at other members in an effort to maintain the status quo/'group think'. I guess it's just easier to attack the 'messenger', rather than the message..... Bush's failure, post 9/11 to secure the border and and his support of the Senate's attempt to sell-out the country.

[MikefromOhio]

After reviewing many of your recent posts to others, on a variety of threads and topics, it is obvious to me that discussing ANYTHING with you, in your current state of mind, is clearly out of the question. I suggest you get the help you need, then we can talk.

ROFLMAO

[Ol' Dan Tucker]

I saw black helicoptors today.

You've seen black helicopters?

I've seen them, too. I've walked around them, talked to their sentries and even been hassled by their unit CO.

Even though this story is a little off-topic, I believe it's relevent in light of your comment.

I fly radio control airplanes on a helo LZ at a local military base. We usually fly every weekend. Occasionally, the military will do some exercises which includes the use of their LZ (our flying field).

One morning, while driving up to the LZ, we noticed about half a dozen black Hughes 500-type choppers lined up on the LZ. There was a guy with a short, military-type haircut sitting in a Toyota Previa minivan. A large Rider bobtail was parked nearby. While speaking with him, he got out to talk to us and I noticed he was wearing military-style jump boots. Even though this is a military base, this struck me as unusual. Most of the time, the military guys I know don't mix their jump boots with civilian cloths. As the conversation progressed, I learned he was in the Army and his unit was in town on a training mission and that he was the sentry guarding the choppers.

I've never seen a sentry in civilian clothes sitting in an unmarked civilian vehicle. Usually, they're in uniform and in marked vehicles. As we walked around the choppers, we saw that they were black, not dark green. And there was no markings on them at all. No US Army, no serial numbers, no unit flashes, nothing.

A short time later, a coupld of unmarked white Ford full-size vans came driving up the road toward the LZ. I knew all the folks who belonged to our club and what kind of cars they drove, but didn't recognize these. They parked, and everyone who piled out were also dressed in civilian garb. One sawed-off little dude was obviously in charge because he was yelling and screaming about how these 'dumb civilians' were all over 'his' LZ.

Meanwhile, someone opened the back of the Rider truck and in it I could see all the unit's flight gear was inside, hanging from the walls and stacked on the floor.

The unit's XO came up and talked to me, asking if we could clear off. I told him it would be no problem.

I found out later from the club's President, that these guys were Delta Force and were there for a training exercise.

So, where and under what circumstances did you see your black helicopters?

[Arizona Carolyn]

Thanks SA.... appreciate all your pings.

[EternalVigilance]

Where's the conspiracy, again?

You and your friends are the only ones discussing "conspiracies". The rest of us were discussing public policy.

[1rudeboy]

Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

conspiracy

[Kimberly GG]

"You and your friends are the only ones discussing "conspiracies". The rest of us were discussing public policy."



Thank you all for your input on this thread. I haven't had much time to post, but have been busy reading through all of the information.

[Kenny Bunk]

There is no doubt that our government, along with the governments of Canada and Mexico, are working toward economic union, along the same lines as the EU.

It is a bit of leap to assume that this will lead to an immediate loss of sovereignty. After all, the member states of the EU still have sovereignty.

However, with the formation of a European Parliament, harmonized customs, open borders for citizens of the member states, and above all, the establishment of the Euro, there is no doubt that many sovereign aspects of the individual European nations states have already ended, or will eventually end. It remains to be seen what sovereignty will remain. For example, the European Parliament, doesn't govern France. It does have great influence over the Parliament of France, which must implement European Union policies in France, through French law.

Planned for us: Open Borders, free movement of citizens of the three countries, a North American Parliament or Congress, a NAU Passport, and a new currency, the "Amero." It remains to be seen what sovereignty will remain after each stage of the planned process of the union.

Put it this way. The United States will not be submerged by the North American Union, but it's going to get mighty wet. How wet? How fast? Is it already a done deal? What will the country look like with 100 million Mexicans as residents?

All valid questions. And so far, not opened for debate as this master plan is developed for us. I have lived and worked in Latin America, including Mexico. Embarrassingly, I did not know much about this, thinking it was a customs union only.

[EternalVigilance]

While making public policy of this importance in secret, and without legislative authority, stinks, and smacks of the way Hillary tried to ram through her national health care plan, enough of it is right out on the open for any person who doesn't willfully wear blinders to be very concerned.

Why aren't you concerned?

[EternalVigilance]

It is a bit of leap to assume that this will lead to an immediate loss of sovereignty. After all, the member states of the EU still have sovereignty.

They've learned from experience that they have to boil the frog slowly or he'll jump out of the pot.

[EternalVigilance]

You're welcome. And thank you for your input. Too many are intimidated by the tactics of the disruptors. I'm glad you're not...and I wish more would follow your example.

[Kenny Bunk]

They've learned from experience that they have to boil the frog slowly or he'll jump out of the pot.

Perhaps that's why we are taking so much heat from some of our freeper colleagues. They seem to feel we are jumping out of the pot prematurely! However, IMHO, it is not paranoia to ask to read the recipe before we're cooked and dinner is served!

[jmc813]

Minority? I don't think so....

There are less than 20 or so of you guys. Y'all are just a very vocal minority.

[jmc813]

CFR is a private group of eggheads and defeated pols

You consider President Bush to be an "egghead"?