Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Corsi, Tancredo on Liddy to Challenge WH unauthorized work on 'North American Union'
World Net Daily ^ | June 14, 2006 | WND

Posted on 06/14/2006 1:22:02 PM PDT by Kenny Bunk

Author Jerome Corsi and Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., will be guests tomorrow on G. Gordon Liddy's radio show to discuss the White House's effort to implement a trilateral agreement with Mexico and Canada that could lead to a North American union, despite having no authorization from Congress.

Corsi and Tancredo will join Liddy for the entire 11 a.m. hour, Eastern time, and take calls from listeners.

Corsi reported this week that Bush administration working groups have not disclosed the results of their work despite two years of massive effort within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada.

The groups, working under the North American Free Trade Agreement office in the Department of Commerce, are to implement the Security and Prosperity Partnership, or SPP, signed by President Bush, Mexican President Vicente Fox and then-Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Texas, March 23, 2005.

The trilateral agreement, signed as a joint declaration not submitted to Congress for review, led to the creation of the SPP office within the Department of Commerce.

Geri Word, who heads the SPP office, told WND the work had not been disclosed because, "We did not want to get the contact people of the working groups distracted by calls from the public."

WND can find no specific congressional legislation authorizing the SPP working groups nor any congressional committees taking charge of oversight.

Many SPP working groups appear to be working toward achieving specific objectives as defined by a May 2005 Council on Foreign Relations task force report, which presented a blueprint for expanding the SPP agreement into a North American union that would merge the U.S., Canada and Mexico into a new governmental form.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 1getalifekooks; amishdudelies; barkingmoonbats; bedlam; bellevue; boobbait; buchananparkdeux; buildtheroad; conspiracynuts; corsi; cuespookymusic; doooooooooooooomed; economictreason; emporerhasnoclothes; farah; fox; ggordonliddy; globalistsundermybed; hedgeisaknucklehead; insane; kookism; kooks; koolaid; leftistmoonbats; libertarians; mexico; moonbats; morethorazineplease; nafta; namericanunion; nau; northamericanunion; notthiscrapagain; nutcases; nutjobs; paranoia; preciousbodilyfluids; prosperity; sellout; sovereignty; spp; stupidity; tancredo; theboogeyman; theskyisnotfalling; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; tinfoilnuttery; us; wnd; workinggroup
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 741-756 next last
To: AmishDude
The choice is obvious.

It is.

Do you have any concerns whatsoever about these agreements and the effect they have on our national sovereignty?

121 posted on 06/14/2006 2:48:13 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No more quarter for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

I'd rather have a military that draws from 100% of the eligible population. We'll have to disagree.


122 posted on 06/14/2006 2:48:40 PM PDT by Reagan 76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Reagan 76
Mike, I've seen you discuss this before and I understand.

Then you know NOT to act like a troll....which you've done three times now on this thread....

Combat in Iraq = Combat in Pusan. Riiiiiight. Tell us all about how it was over there....and we all understand it's a volunteer army. Glad you didn't use the word professional.

Where did I EVER compare Pusan to Iraq? That came from you. Meanwhile you continue to post your leftist rantings about how the Bush children aren't in the military (that's straight from DailyKOS and DU BTW) and how, for whatever reason, you seem to want the military to NOT be a volunteer army.
123 posted on 06/14/2006 2:49:14 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Absolutely. I think we should have no talks with either Canada or Mexico and take our chances trying to protect our border ourselves instead of asking our bordering countries to help.


124 posted on 06/14/2006 2:49:59 PM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves Amishdude. Or else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

LOL

Considering who is complaining about these supposed "agreements", I'm not worried in the least.


125 posted on 06/14/2006 2:50:37 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

We've already discussed this, you could be my son. Hey, sidenote, I just became a grandma last week. We were concerned the baby would be born on 6-6-6, but she held off until the 8th. 7 lbs, 4 oz. Perfect little angel. And, I got to be there for the birth, what a miracle. Sophia Ann.


126 posted on 06/14/2006 2:51:18 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
We've already discussed this, you could be my son. Hey, sidenote, I just became a grandma last week. We were concerned the baby would be born on 6-6-6, but she held off until the 8th. 7 lbs, 4 oz. Perfect little angel. And, I got to be there for the birth, what a miracle. Sophia Ann.

I know I know :) Congratulations!!! I was going to make a crack about every kid being born on 6-6-6 needs to be named Damien or something, but I'll hold off this one time hehe
127 posted on 06/14/2006 2:52:35 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

I agree. But, the effort being made is not about "protecting our borders." It's about getting everyone in all three countries to work for $6.25 an hour and no benefits.


128 posted on 06/14/2006 2:52:42 PM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance
We've already discussed this, you could be my son.

Funny. I'd think you would know for sure.

129 posted on 06/14/2006 2:52:43 PM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves Amishdude. Or else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Reagan 76

So, who were you in your previous banned live(s)?


130 posted on 06/14/2006 2:52:55 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude
Absolutely. I think we should have no talks with either Canada or Mexico and take our chances trying to protect our border ourselves instead of asking our bordering countries to help.

You just can't stop the juvenile sarcasm long enough to have a serious conversation, can you.

131 posted on 06/14/2006 2:53:35 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (No more quarter for RINOs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

How can anyone doubt that this is underway ? The Trans Texas Corridor, does it ring a bell ?


132 posted on 06/14/2006 2:53:41 PM PDT by John Lenin (The RAT party is still Stuck on Stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MikefromOhio

Thanks, it's not critical, I just can't remember his name, and he's from my daughter's unit.


133 posted on 06/14/2006 2:53:58 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

Well if you can't be Emperor perhaps you can reign as Governor of Kansas and serve our new Mexican Masters from the new scary custom House to be built in Kansas city that has got Corsi and others in here in such an uproar. Nothing like serving the sinister designs of Presendente Bush by the plot to subvert us by giving us access to better and cheaper tequila

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1647796/posts


134 posted on 06/14/2006 2:54:19 PM PDT by catholicfreeper (I am Blogging for the GOP and Victory O6 at www.theponderingamerican.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Types_with_Fist
I agree.

Wow. Just...wow.

135 posted on 06/14/2006 2:54:23 PM PDT by AmishDude (Everybody loves Amishdude. Or else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: Reagan 76

So, why didn't you enlist?


136 posted on 06/14/2006 2:54:36 PM PDT by Indy Pendance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Kenny Bunk

Do you actually believe what you're saying?

I can't believe how many paranoid delusionists post at this forum.

It's an embarrassment.


137 posted on 06/14/2006 2:54:58 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

yeah

for some reason that is ringing a bell, but I can't place the name either.


138 posted on 06/14/2006 2:55:05 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: Indy Pendance

he's been banned....

Finally.


139 posted on 06/14/2006 2:55:26 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (aka MikeinIraq - WTFO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

There aren't any "talks" going on. There is outright collusion. That's a bit different.


140 posted on 06/14/2006 2:56:31 PM PDT by Types_with_Fist (I'm on FReep so often that when I read an article at another site I scroll down for the comments.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 741-756 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson