Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Administration Quietly Plans NAFTA Super Highway
Human Events ^ | June 12, 2006 | Jerome Corsi

Posted on 06/12/2006 6:23:16 AM PDT by conservativecorner

Quietly but systematically, the Bush Administration is advancing the plan to build a huge NAFTA Super Highway, four football-fields-wide, through the heart of the U.S. along Interstate 35, from the Mexican border at Laredo, Tex., to the Canadian border north of Duluth, Minn.

Once complete, the new road will allow containers from the Far East to enter the United States through the Mexican port of Lazaro Cardenas, bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process. The Mexican trucks, without the involvement of the Teamsters Union, will drive on what will be the nation’s most modern highway straight into the heart of America. The Mexican trucks will cross border in FAST lanes, checked only electronically by the new “SENTRI” system. The first customs stop will be a Mexican customs office in Kansas City, their new Smart Port complex, a facility being built for Mexico at a cost of $3 million to the U.S. taxpayers in Kansas City.

As incredible as this plan may seem to some readers, the first Trans-Texas Corridor segment of the NAFTA Super Highway is ready to begin construction next year. Various U.S. government agencies, dozens of state agencies, and scores of private NGOs (non-governmental organizations) have been working behind the scenes to create the NAFTA Super Highway, despite the lack of comment on the plan by President Bush. The American public is largely asleep to this key piece of the coming “North American Union” that government planners in the new trilateral region of United States, Canada and Mexico are about to drive into reality.

Just examine the following websites to get a feel for the magnitude of NAFTA Super Highway planning that has been going on without any new congressional legislation directly authorizing the construction of the planned international corridor through the center of the country.

NASCO, the North America SuperCorridor Coalition Inc., is a “non-profit organization dedicated to developing the world’s first international, integrated and secure, multi-modal transportation system along the International Mid-Continent Trade and Transportation Corridor to improve both the trade competitiveness and quality of life in North America.” Where does that sentence say anything about the USA? Still, NASCO has received $2.5 million in earmarks from the U.S. Department of Transportation to plan the NAFTA Super Highway as a 10-lane limited-access road (five lanes in each direction) plus passenger and freight rail lines running alongside pipelines laid for oil and natural gas. One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway on the front page of the NASCO website will make clear that the design is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation system.

Kansas City SmartPort Inc. is an “investor based organization supported by the public and private sector” to create the key hub on the NAFTA Super Highway. At the Kansas City SmartPort, the containers from the Far East can be transferred to trucks going east and west, dramatically reducing the ground transportation time dropping the containers off in Los Angeles or Long Beach involves for most of the country. A brochure on the SmartPort website describes the plan in glowing terms: “For those who live in Kansas City, the idea of receiving containers nonstop from the Far East by way of Mexico may sound unlikely, but later this month that seemingly far-fetched notion will become a reality.”

The U.S. government has housed within the Department of Commerce (DOC) an “SPP office” that is dedicated to organizing the many working groups laboring within the executive branches of the U.S., Mexico and Canada to create the regulatory reality for the Security and Prosperity Partnership. The SPP agreement was signed by Bush, President Vicente Fox, and then-Prime Minister Paul Martin in Waco, Tex., on March 23, 2005. According to the DOC website, a U.S.-Mexico Joint Working Committee on Transportation Planning has finalized a plan such that “(m)ethods for detecting bottlenecks on the U.S.-Mexico border will be developed and low cost/high impact projects identified in bottleneck studies will be constructed or implemented.” The report notes that new SENTRI travel lanes on the Mexican border will be constructed this year. The border at Laredo should be reduced to an electronic speed bump for the Mexican trucks containing goods from the Far East to enter the U.S. on their way to the Kansas City SmartPort.

The Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) is overseeing the Trans-Texas Corridor (TTC) as the first leg of the NAFTA Super Highway. A 4,000-page environmental impact statement has already been completed and public hearings are scheduled for five weeks, beginning next month, in July 2006. The billions involved will be provided by a foreign company, Cintra Concessions de Infraestructuras de Transporte, S.A. of Spain. As a consequence, the TTC will be privately operated, leased to the Cintra consortium to be operated as a toll-road. The details of the NAFTA Super Highway are hidden in plan view. Still, Bush has not given speeches to bring the NAFTA Super Highway plans to the full attention of the American public. Missing in the move toward creating a North American Union is the robust public debate that preceded the decision to form the European Union. All this may be for calculated political reasons on the part of the Bush Administration.

A good reason Bush does not want to secure the border with Mexico may be that the administration is trying to create express lanes for Mexican trucks to bring containers with cheap Far East goods into the heart of the U.S., all without the involvement of any U.S. union workers on the docks or in the trucks.


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: agenda21; algoresfault; americansellout; authorisakook; bedlam; bellevue; bioreserves; bushsoldout; cafta; canada; corsi; corsiisanoob; countfloyd; cuespookymusic; cwojackson; daviddean; foxiesworld; freetrade; freetraitors; ftaa; fullmoon; future; headinsand; i35; ih35; interstate35; judgejeffmoseley; kook; kookism; koolaid; lunarphase; mexico; morethorazineplease; nafta; nasco; nascocorridor; newworldorder; northamerica; northamericanunion; nutcase; nutjob; onewolrdnoborders; oneworldnoborders; senkeithleftwichd; supercorridor; texas; texasforever; tinfoil; tinfoilhat; tinfoilhysteria; trade; transportation; transtexascorridor; ttc; ttc35; txdot; unitednations; usna
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 761-777 next last
To: Dog Gone
OMG, America is planning to build a ROAD!!! It's the end of the world!

It is already possible to drive by interstate from Laredo to Duluth. Adding another road, though, will bring the Apocalypse down upon us all!!

This North American Union - Amero - CFR panic is not even sane enough to be called moonbat.

Anyway, we're all already doomed to become Mexican Muslim Communists because they put fluoride in our water and subliminal messages in rock music and the movies.

Even Captain Queeg thinks this stuff qualifies as paranoid.

121 posted on 06/12/2006 2:32:09 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

bttt!


122 posted on 06/12/2006 2:32:45 PM PDT by nicmarlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]

To: winodog
This wall through the middle of America will one day be used by our enemies.

We're building a wall in the middle of America? Why? Is there some new kumbaya stunt called "Wall Across America" or something? I hope not because "Hands Across America" was stupid enough.

123 posted on 06/12/2006 2:34:59 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Letting furriners operate the road will make it that much more difficult to move military units during a crisis. [hoot]


124 posted on 06/12/2006 2:37:12 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 123 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Just trying to help in my own, inimitable way.


125 posted on 06/12/2006 2:38:09 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats

Please refute the article. We are all very interested in seeing what you can point out to be false.


126 posted on 06/12/2006 2:39:39 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: beaelysium
Jerry Garza named to corridor coalition [North America's SuperCorridor Coalition VP]
LAREDO MORNING TIMES ^ | February 17, 2006 | JULIE DAFFERN

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1580716/posts

127 posted on 06/12/2006 2:43:45 PM PDT by antonia (Build the Wall Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
One glance at the map of the NAFTA Super Highway on the front page of the NASCO website will make clear that the design is to connect Mexico, Canada, and the U.S. into one transportation system.

One glance at an interstate highway map will tell everyone that there already ARE roads connecting the United States Interstate Highway System to Canada and Mexico.

There are also plenty of containers from the Far East that do not go through Long Beach.

You do realize that containers come into this country from all over the world, don't you? So what possible difference would it make if they come by sea from China to Long Beach or if they come from China to the USA via rail or truck in Mexico? Are Mexicans somehow worse than Communists?

128 posted on 06/12/2006 2:49:35 PM PDT by You Dirty Rats (I Love Free Republic!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: TxDOT; 1066AD; 185JHP; Abcdefg; Adrastus; Alamo-Girl; antivenom; anymouse; AprilfromTexas; ...

Trans-Texas Corridor PING!


129 posted on 06/12/2006 2:51:28 PM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (One flag--American. One language--English. One allegiance--to America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer
"Trans-Texas Corridor — Because there are issues of confiscation of private land, State and National sovereignty and other similar concerns, we urge the repeal of the Trans-Texas Corridor legislation."

Guess what? Nearly all new roads are built at least partially on private lands.

I guess we should build no new roads in this country. Heck, maybe we should tear up the ones we have and return the land to private ownership.

130 posted on 06/12/2006 3:00:55 PM PDT by Dog Gone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: Drango
bypassing the Longshoreman’s Union in the process.

How can this be bad?

Because you hate unions you have ended up hating American sovereignty- moron!

131 posted on 06/12/2006 3:01:48 PM PDT by dennisw (We should return to calling them Muhammadans -- Worshippers of Muhammad and maybe Allah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: You Dirty Rats
One glance at an interstate highway map will tell everyone that there already ARE roads connecting the United States Interstate Highway System to Canada and Mexico.

These roads have customs inspection points at their end points. The NAfTA highway places mexican customs on sovereign Mexican territory in Kansas City. Thats a HUGE difference my friend.

There are also plenty of containers from the Far East that do not go through Long Beach.

Currently they do not go through ports in Baja and western mexico, however through the NAFTA plan they will. How convenient for crooks and enemies of the state, they will no longer have to deal with US customs. And how awful for American citizens. They lose one more stick in the sovereignty bundle, and have NO say or authority over how goods are inspected or brought into the country because they will no longer be in charge of this vital function of a sovereign nation.

So what possible difference would it make if they come by sea from China to Long Beach or if they come from China to the USA via rail or truck in Mexico? Are Mexicans somehow worse than Communists?

More corrupt? Its hard to say. But with Mexico's mordita and China's penchant for bribery to get its way, why would any sane American risk America's security to them?
132 posted on 06/12/2006 3:08:55 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer

A customs facility is not sovereign territory, no matter where it is located. Quit the hysterics.


133 posted on 06/12/2006 3:09:59 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: conservativecorner

He's got it partly wrong. From Laredo to the Red River this is a Texas project, and we are well aware of wehat is going on.


134 posted on 06/12/2006 3:13:54 PM PDT by RobbyS ( CHIRHO)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone
Nearly all new roads are built at least partially on private lands.

And if the land is condemned, is it for public use? Or for foreign corporations private gain? I bid you to review Kelo vs New London and tell me how constitutional you think it was.
135 posted on 06/12/2006 3:20:03 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies]

To: hedgetrimmer; Dog Gone; Diddle E. Squat; deport; maui_hawaii; Ben Ficklin; zeugma; MeekOneGOP; ...
And if the land is condemned, is it for public use? Or for foreign corporations private gain? I bid you to review Kelo vs New London and tell me how constitutional you think it was.

Transportation rights of way have always involved the use of eminent domain even when it was private companies building the roads or railroads. Transportation is a public use even if the operator of the road is a private corporation.

136 posted on 06/12/2006 3:25:03 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies]

To: butternut_squash_bisque
Don;t forget AAMVA (American Assoc. of Motor Vehicle Administrators) and their beloved DLA (Driver License Agreement - page 4, item 11). The DLA requirements for states to sign died in the 108th Congress Intel Legislation, it was removed from the Real ID Act (bad law still concerning licenses), now up in the immigration bill. This concerned states (US & Mexican) and the Canadian Provinces linking up their drier's license databases to become a Tri-National ID.

Ironic, the work on the DLA started in 1994, around the time that NAFTA was signed into law.
NAFTA, CAFTA, CFR, UN, NWO, guest worker amnesty program, and now this monstrosity to split America in half, and provide a super-highway for terrorists and illegal aliens, right in America's Heartland.
137 posted on 06/12/2006 3:25:44 PM PDT by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Forget it. They're on a roll.


138 posted on 06/12/2006 3:27:10 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
By the summer, the Mexican government will be in Kansas City's West Bottoms. The city will spend $3 million to build a Mexican customs house on Liberty Street, clearing American goods, mainly grain exports headed south.

***

Meanwhile, SmartPort negotiated with the Mexican Customs service to locate a facility in Kansas Cityon Mexican sovereign territory to clear exports to Mexico, thus avoiding clogged boarders. This will be the first in the nation.

***

City officials had hoped that the first foreign customhouse on U.S. soil would be built and opened by June, but federal approval has bogged down.

“We are waiting for the final OK from the State Department,” she said. “We’re hoping in the next month they will figure it out.”


***

How to end-run American sovereignty? I am sure the President will issue an EO to get around a pesky issue like that. Maybe have an NGO like SmartPort illegally negotiate it too.
139 posted on 06/12/2006 3:28:57 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer ("I'm a millionaire thanks to the WTO and "free trade" system--Hu Jintao top 10 worst dictators)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Heck, look at the numbers on the North American Union BS...it's way up there.


140 posted on 06/12/2006 3:28:59 PM PDT by CWOJackson (Go Mike Go!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 761-777 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson