Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lacrosse Scandal: The Duke Accuser—New Credibility Questions (Newsweek)
Newsweek ^ | June 19, 2006 Issue | Susannah Meadows

Posted on 06/11/2006 10:06:55 AM PDT by zaxxon

Early in the Duke lacrosse rape investigation, Durham District Attorney Mike Nifong, who was in a close race to keep his job, spoke about the physical and emotional trauma the alleged victim had suffered at the hands of the players. A police affidavit stated that her medical records revealed the victim had "injuries consistent with being raped and sexually assaulted vaginally and anally." But according to a motion filed by defense attorneys last week, no such physical trauma was found during her exam at Duke hospital. Quoting from the report, which was submitted to the court under seal, the motion states that the nurse—who was in training—examined the woman's entire pelvic region and noted only diffuse swelling of the vaginal walls, a condition explainable by consensual sexual activity.

Police documents indicate that the accuser had in fact engaged in such activity in the days leading up to the incident. The accuser told police that she'd had sex with her boyfriend a week before. She added that she'd also performed using a vibrator in front of a couple. (Though the timing of this incident is not specific, the clear implication is that it had happened near the time of the lacrosse party.) And, according to defense attorneys, the boyfriend's seminal fluid was found in her, suggesting she'd also had sex with him within 72 hours. Jarriel Johnson, who identified himself as the woman's driver, told police in a statement that in addition to sleeping with the accuser himself a week prior to the party, he'd taken her to several appointments at hotels in the days before.

(Excerpt) Read more at msnbc.msn.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: duke; dukelax; durhamdirtbag; nifong; precious; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 681-685 next last
To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Lotsa computer burps tonight


561 posted on 06/14/2006 6:20:24 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

Isn't it great that the defense is every day getting more and more in his face. I am so please this story is going strong after Zarqawi and Bush going to Iraq. That means it is not going away.


562 posted on 06/14/2006 6:22:32 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Colmes teased that Liefong "verbally threatened" one of the defense attorneys.

Holy f'n cow. Somebody put Mikey on suicide watch. This dude is losin' it.

563 posted on 06/14/2006 6:22:53 PM PDT by zaxxon ("A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Panel on H & C Continued

1. Hannity says prosicutorial abuse details Nifong lies in the press. Asks Bondi about his obligation? Bondi hopes he did not act for pure political benefit. Says you have to have a reasonable likelihood of success at trial. Colmes jumps in with lies.

2. Colmes claims they are scared of Nifong. Kendall says maybe he is biased. She says he needs to get off the case, but it will not successful.

3. Colmes says Pittman [aka Roberts] has changed her story.

4. Suskauer agree with Kendall on both objective and motion will fail and says to Colmes Roberts has her own credibility problems.

5. Hannity says personal threats to defense attorneys.


564 posted on 06/14/2006 6:27:16 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 562 | View Replies]

To: All
Alan - Is the defense trying to get Nifong off the case because he knows something.

Get him off the case because he knows something? Alan is a fn' idiot.
565 posted on 06/14/2006 6:28:06 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: JLS

Bondi seems to be objective about this (from what I saw tonight)

BTW--hate the new H&C graphic. I feel like I am in first grade.


566 posted on 06/14/2006 6:28:37 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: Protect the Bill of Rights
Colmes suggests that the reason the defense wants Liefong off the case is that they're afraid of what he has.

Tomorrow Alan Colmes may just introduce the Loch Ness Monster into one of his scenarios.

567 posted on 06/14/2006 6:29:29 PM PDT by zaxxon ("A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

I've been looking at Osborn's site all along. He never redacted anything from the get go.

Lots of good stuff there. Particularly the affidavits given to the defense.


568 posted on 06/14/2006 6:30:44 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 536 | View Replies]

To: JLS
You know it would be funny, if the next time one of these talking heads say they still want to see everything Nifong's has. If Hannity could say will Nifong was suppose to turn over all the information to the defense and I can get you in touch with them.
569 posted on 06/14/2006 6:30:52 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 564 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

Which one?


570 posted on 06/14/2006 6:31:36 PM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 546 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

Colmes needs to get a clue. Maybe they are concerned about their clients getting a fair trial? Ya think? Maybe?

The word to express my emotion has not been invented.


571 posted on 06/14/2006 6:31:40 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

Comment #572 Removed by Moderator

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

I REALLY don't think so!!

Way too hunky to be gay.


573 posted on 06/14/2006 6:33:04 PM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon
Colmes suggests that the reason the defense wants Liefong off the case is that they're afraid of what he has.

You know, if Nifong knows something and passes this case off, I am sure he will the the person he hands it off to. This has to be one of the dumbest things Alan has said in quite some time.
574 posted on 06/14/2006 6:33:09 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 567 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

he will tell the person


575 posted on 06/14/2006 6:34:45 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

My computer is posting everything twice. What did I do?


576 posted on 06/14/2006 6:35:10 PM PDT by sissyjane (Don't be stuck on stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 573 | View Replies]

To: All

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=5484069

Kim's latest version on NPR, if you haven't heard it already. It's a bit nauseating...


577 posted on 06/14/2006 6:35:45 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 551 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead
You know it would be funny, if the next time one of these talking heads say they still want to see everything Nifong's has. If Hannity could say will Nifong was suppose to turn over all the information to the defense and I can get you in touch with them.

That would be funny. You should e-mail that suggestion to him.
578 posted on 06/14/2006 6:36:25 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 569 | View Replies]

To: zaxxon

Maybe he's bipolar, too! ;)


579 posted on 06/14/2006 6:40:47 PM PDT by Dukie07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: sissyjane

Post half as often : )


580 posted on 06/14/2006 6:43:10 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 541-560561-580581-600 ... 681-685 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson