Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

IE And Firefox Sport New Zero-day Flaw
TechWeb ^ | 06 June 2006 | Gregg Keizer

Posted on 06/07/2006 6:47:44 AM PDT by ShadowAce

Multiple security organizations warned Tuesday that Internet Explorer, Firefox, Mozilla, and SeaMonkey -- on Windows, Linux, and the Mac -- are vulnerable to a JavaScript bug that could allow a determined attacker to dupe users into giving up sensitive personal information such as credit card or bank account numbers and passwords.

According to Symantec, which issued an alert late afternoon Tuesday, all versions of the Microsoft and Mozilla browsers could be used to harvest data through a JavaScript key-filtering vulnerability.

"This issue is triggered by utilizing JavaScript 'OnKeyDown' events to capture and duplicate keystrokes from users," went the Symantec warning.

The bug would let crafty criminals filter keystrokes entered into a form, say a credit card form to pay for online goods, to an invisible file upload dialog on the same Web page. Once the information's trapped in that hidden dialog -- the vulnerability discoverer used the analogy of the keystrokes "bouncing" from the legit (or at least legitimate-looking form) to the cloaked one -- the data could be sent to the attacker.

"Exploiting this issue requires that users manually type the full path of files that attackers wish to download…[and] may require substantial typing from targeted users, so keyboard-based games, blogs, or other similar pages are likely to be utilized by attackers to entice users to enter the required keyboard input to exploit this issue," continued Symantec.

Danish vulnerability tracker Secunia also posted warnings of the bug Tuesday, and ranked it as "less critical," the second-from-the-bottom rating in its five-step scoring system.

The bug is unusual in that it affects not only Internet Explorer -- including fully-patched IE 6.0 and even IE 7 Beta 2 -- but also Firefox (though the most current version 1.5.0.4), the Mozilla suite, and the separately-developed successor to Mozilla, SeaMonkey. It's also out of the ordinary by virtue of its multi-platform impact: users of those browsers running Windows, Linux, and Mac OS X are vulnerable, said Symantec.

Charles McAuley, who first posted information about the bug on the Full Disclosure security mailing list Monday, also published proof-of-concept code to demonstrate how an exploit might work.

Symantec advised users to avoid unfamiliar Web neighborhoods and/or disable scripting or active content capabilities of the affected browsers.


TOPICS: Computers/Internet
KEYWORDS: browser; firefox; ie; phishing

1 posted on 06/07/2006 6:47:47 AM PDT by ShadowAce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; Bush2000; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; ...

2 posted on 06/07/2006 6:48:03 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
Firefox can outrun the virus at Mach 6 or destroy it by firing rear missiles (but only if you think in Russian). Not one of Clint's better movies.


3 posted on 06/07/2006 6:50:58 AM PDT by edpc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
NoScript for Firefox. Don't leave home without it!

"Extra protection for your Firefox: NoScript allows JavaScript, Java (and other plugins) only for trusted domains of your choice (e.g. your home-banking web site). This whitelist based pre-emptive blocking approach prevents exploitation of security vulnerabilities (known and even unknown!) with no loss of functionality... Experts will agree: Firefox is really safer with NoScript ;-)"


4 posted on 06/07/2006 6:51:12 AM PDT by FoxInSocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edpc
The last 30 minutes or so were pretty cool but yeah, the other part was difficult to slog through.
5 posted on 06/07/2006 6:52:08 AM PDT by Lx (Do you like it, do you like it. Scott? I call it Mr. and Mrs. Tennerman chili.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

So much for Open software being more secure....


6 posted on 06/07/2006 6:52:44 AM PDT by Freeport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

It is more secure. Post #4 is one reason why.


7 posted on 06/07/2006 6:58:46 AM PDT by Clara Lou (A conservative is a liberal who has been mugged by reality. --I. Kristol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FoxInSocks

NoScript rocks. It's a part of my standard list of critical extensions.


8 posted on 06/07/2006 7:30:20 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Freeport
So much for Open software being more secure....

This vulnerability appears to affect ...

  Internet Explorer, Firefox, Mozilla, and SeaMonkey -- on Windows, Linux, and the Mac

Rather than being something wrong with open source processes, it sounds more to me like it is an issue with javascript itself. It also sounds like someone would have to go through a lot of trouble to be affected by this. 

9 posted on 06/07/2006 7:34:08 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Freeport

The flaw isn't in the affected browsers but in Java. So this shouldn't count as a black mark on Firefox, nor on IE or any of the other browsers.

I guess they could have included a security feature to plug this hole, but it's not their hole.


10 posted on 06/07/2006 8:32:08 AM PDT by Still Thinking (Disregard the law of unintended consequences at your own risk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce
"This issue is triggered by utilizing JavaScript 'OnKeyDown' events to capture and duplicate keystrokes from users,"

What the article doesn't mention is that for Firefox users, disabling Java scripting is as easy as a click of a button.
And I know many FF users who do just that.

11 posted on 06/07/2006 1:32:41 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (I can't complain...but sometimes I still do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zeugma
NoScript rocks. It's a part of my standard list of critical extensions.

Do you use AdBlock or AdBlock plus? If so, which do you prefer?

12 posted on 06/12/2006 8:37:57 AM PDT by CedarDave (DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON! If it wasn't for double standards, democrats would have NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CedarDave

I don't mess with adblockers. I just right click on the images from ad sites, and =poof= nothing more from that site. Doesn't take long to train it.


13 posted on 06/12/2006 9:51:50 AM PDT by zeugma (I reject your reality and substitute my own in its place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: zeugma

Thanks. I pretty much do the same. Disabled it on my laptop, never downloaded on my desktop.


14 posted on 06/12/2006 11:51:17 AM PDT by CedarDave (DemocRATs- the CULTURE OF TREASON! If it wasn't for double standards, democrats would have NONE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson