I'd trust a dog's nose before I'd trust a lawyer any day of the week.
Especially the defense attorney for the accused murderer. LOL at the comment about "clothes soaking in a bucket" not having anything to do with the case.
I won't take her word for it, since Dyleski did walk past that exact location between the murder scene and his house. However, I don't know about those clothes - we never found out for sure what was soaking, whether it was jeans or something else and whether the red color came from blood or not. It was supposedly soaking in OxyClean or whatever the protein-busting detergent is that can get rid of blood evidence.
Not that it matters at all, when Pamela's blood was found on his *other* clothes that he had hidden and *were* found by the scent dogs. There's a ton more evidence linking him to the crime, but the gag order has been very effective in this case. All we really know is the minimal outline that was presented at the preliminary hearing.
I was very interested in this case and wanted to follow it through to see that Ms Vitale got justice -- and mainly to find out what the motive or excuse was on Dyleski's part. Also to hear more from his girlfriend Jena.
But once I heard what the DA had, I just totally lost interest and haven't been back to sleuth any more or add to my notes. He is quite guilty, IMO - I don't think there will be any surprises.
My Beagles, when I had them, were as reliable as the sunrise. Dogs don't lie!