Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Of Faith and Facts: Is SETI a Religion?
space.com ^ | 06/01/06 | David Darling

Posted on 06/05/2006 7:10:53 PM PDT by KevinDavis

Is SETI—the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence—a religion? This is one of the topics that Jill Tarter, Director of the Center for SETI Research at the SETI Institute, and I discussed on "Are We Alone?", the SETI Institute's weekly radio program on Wednesday May 17.

The discussion by Jill and I was in response to a claim made by George Basalla (professor emeritus of history at the University of Delaware) in his book Civilized Life in the Universe (Oxford University Press: 2006) that SETI is more of a faith-based enterprise than a genuine science. He points to SETI's failure to make "contact" after more than forty years of trying and its continuing efforts in the absence of any positive evidence as a sign that it relies more on a kind of religious zeal than anything else. (Incidentally, Basalla was invited to appear on the show but declined.)

(Excerpt) Read more at space.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Religion; Science
KEYWORDS: atheism; faith; religion; seti; space; ufocult
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last
To: anymouse
So if the SETI folks finally get an intelligible signal...

They're too busy squabbling right now to pay attention to it.

At least the S@H people are, for the past week.

Check out any of threads at http://setiathome.berkeley.edu/forum_forum.php?id=10
with subject words as crunc3r, on strike, tony, or words meaning immature, apology, etc.

In a nutshell, an apparently people-skills-challenged mod publicly accused a highly regarded volunteer of "cheating"
on the amount of "work" claimed by 2 of 20 pcs that look for ET.

21 posted on 06/06/2006 5:20:17 AM PDT by Calvin Locke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Dog Gone

Well, yes and no.

SETI is looking for signals that arguably have an intelligent cause, while in another corner there a very loud 'defenders of science' who say that intelligent causation can't be a scientific hypothesis.


22 posted on 06/06/2006 7:53:13 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (And when they behead your own people in the wars which are to come, then you will know. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-22 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson