So, if the accuser was identifying 3.9 of the lacrosse players, and the .9 was the "90%" Evans, does that mean she was 100% certain of Image 4? If so, then why hasn't he been indicted? Is he turning for the DA?
As the transcript shows, Sgt. Gottlieb was curiously uninterested in her hit on the unknown Image 4. He didn't ask her degree of certainty about him. Early on, I read that two of the players (or their lawyers) presented proof that they weren't even in NC on the night of the party. Nifong declined to exclude them from the team testing. I think Image 4 was one of those two who Gottlieb knew wasn't at the party, much less one of the attackers.
A defense attorney, Cheshire I think, said to the press once that she had IDed someone who was not in Durham at the time. I like GAgal suspect that the first ID on the 4 of April was that person.
Now I know you might ask, not being in Durham is hardly reason for Nifong not to indict someone. But I guess they wanted the numbers to match as close a possible and 2.9 is closer to 3 than 3.9.
My understanding is that he was out of state and that fact was already known to Nifong and/or DPD.