I was referrring to the possiblity of someone assisting the AV behind the scenes and potentially coordinating witness statements and/or media interviews.
See Post #470 and #509.
thank you
..but if I'm reading you correctly, you're saying there's a mysterious puppet master pulling everyone's strings in order to get a conviction for these young men?
Or did I misunderstand you?
Also, I'm unclear what David Allen is saying?.....Are you suggesting she will start a civil suit?....how can she do this when it strongly looks like she can't win in criminal court?
OK, let me think this through....
..OJ was acquitted ...but the victim's relatives won in civil court....
..but OJ was guilty....
..these young men aren't.
Sorry...I'm as confused as I sound :(
Brian's story is a mess. She put on her costume and he just said uh-huh. Me thinks not. I'll bet the DNA is his and also explains why she was already in her underwear....which was an apparent no-no.
Can someone define "underwear" more particularly. It's a very broad term.....like "is".