Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: pepperhead

Or how many real victims don't get the searches, investigations, and prosecution they deserve because this FRAUD of a case is Durham's Priority number 1.

There are people getting hurt her other than the lacrosse players and their families. There's only so much court time, preparation, investigation, and lab time to go around.

This case has even kept the City Manager busy. A least one kid in Durham Died of Lead Poisioning from Durham's Tap water, but Patrick Baker is running around reinterviewing Police that have already filed reports and know how to do their jobs.



334 posted on 05/31/2006 12:32:50 PM PDT by Mike Nifong (Any likeness to persons living or dead is entirely coincidental)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies ]


To: All
Don't know if this was posted previously. This is an interview Nifong did with Dan Abrams on March 31st. Here is the exchange pertaining to the initial 911 call:

NIFONG: Well, again, I have—certainly one of the theories that I've heard is that the woman who was not inside was the person who made that call. And again, I don't really intend to comment on any of that to the extent that any of that is relevant. That is evidence that will be heard at trial.

ABRAMS: Have you identified the person who made the 911-call?

NIFONG: Have I personally identified...

ABRAMS: Yes.

NIFONG: Do I know if the...

ABRAMS: Do you know who it is?

NIFONG: ... to my knowledge that—I do not.

ABRAMS: OK. So that person has not come forward to say I was the one who made the call.

NIFONG: To my knowledge, no one has done that yet.

So, on March 31, Nifong is saying he doesn't know who made the first 911 call? Is there anything in the discovery to contradict that claim?

335 posted on 05/31/2006 12:35:37 PM PDT by zaxxon ("A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

To: All
Don't know if this was posted previously. This is an interview Nifong did with Dan Abrams on March 31st. Here is the exchange pertaining to the initial 911 call:

NIFONG: Well, again, I have—certainly one of the theories that I've heard is that the woman who was not inside was the person who made that call. And again, I don't really intend to comment on any of that to the extent that any of that is relevant. That is evidence that will be heard at trial.

ABRAMS: Have you identified the person who made the 911-call?

NIFONG: Have I personally identified...

ABRAMS: Yes.

NIFONG: Do I know if the...

ABRAMS: Do you know who it is?

NIFONG: ... to my knowledge that—I do not.

ABRAMS: OK. So that person has not come forward to say I was the one who made the call.

NIFONG: To my knowledge, no one has done that yet.

So, on March 31, Nifong is saying he doesn't know who made the first 911 call? Is there anything in the discovery to contradict that claim?

336 posted on 05/31/2006 12:35:45 PM PDT by zaxxon ("A lie can travel halfway around the world while the truth is putting on its shoes ." -Mark Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

To: Mike Nifong
Or how many real victims don't get the searches, investigations, and prosecution they deserve because this FRAUD of a case is Durham's Priority number 1.

That is what get me mad. Rape is serious. It is up there with assault and right under murder. All the feminist out there are hurting their cause supporting this ho.

341 posted on 05/31/2006 1:16:37 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson