[Wristpin]

Sheesh...Your argument sounds like the homo lobby fighting for the right to give blood due to their "perceived" civil rights discrimination.


Emotional? I don't get it...This attack was just another data point in the case of against a fighting breed designed for nothing but killing. That's the facts-Jack! Now, You have been reduced to casting the liberal epithet due to having lost the argument based on data. The data reveals that ABPT's are over represented in killings and serious maulings by a large margin. Typical liberal denial!

There's nothing in the constitution garanteeing unrestricted fighting breed dog ownership..nothing whatsoever!...Heroin, handgrenades, mountain lions, tanks and venomous snakes are all example of prohibited property items.

Personally, I wouldn't give a damn if the attacks were limited to the owners...Then it would be merely a case of Darwinism. But they are not unfortunately, just google "Pit Bull shot" and see how many of these dogs are shot beserking neighborhoods.

Our inner cities are nearly third world countries because of liberal denial and neglect. In lieu of a proper solution from the Pit community, who seem hellbent on selling more dogs at the expense of public safety, the authorities will have to develop solutions. That's how it works in a normally functioning Republic. Feel free to call it nanny statism...some consider it reigning in criminal conduct.

Like I said earlier, the breed is only 200 years old and was selected by lowlifes for fighting. There's no useful purpose served by having them in neighborhoods.


Feel free to stick your fingers in your ears and stomp up and down like a child....

[proud_yank]

Ok, so the question is this: "What breed will come next?"

To think that once a specific breed is banned, and that no others will follow, is patently absurd.

[GMMAC]

You keep talking about "breed" and the point is that there isn't one: only certain dogs which control freaks like you don't happen to like the look of.

"Look of" because, if people like you could come up with any sort of legally binding definition as to what precisely constitutes a 'pit bull', Courts wouldn't keep tossing out your thus flawed statutes.

Plus, given that no one here is opposed to coming down like the proverbial ton of bricks on both negligent owners and dogs who exhibit and/or have a specific proven history of viciousness, I find it absolutely impossible to comprehend your problem ???
Are you just a couple of Trolls here to waste people's time & generally promote acrimony & disruption ???

How, as any sort of self-proclaimed conservative, can you possibly justify imposing such arbitrary governmental harassment on otherwise good & law-abiding citizens ???

Finally, how can you presume to know better than virtually every recognized animal welfare body in North America which stands in total opposition to so-called 'breed ban legislation' ???

Aside from you having consistently ignored all of the above, throw in being in bed with the likes of PETA & it's pretty clear who has their fingers in their ears ... or some appendage in some part of their anatomy.