Pit bulls shot to death after attack on cow (sad picture of mother cow, protecting it's calf)

ajc.com ^ | 05/24/06 | Mark Davis

[Polybius]

The UKC is the registering organization that recognizes APBT's and originally wouldn't give papers unless the dog had 3 documented kills.

Three documented kills?

Rabbits, foxes, cows, Sopwith Camels?

[Fair Go]

There are far bigger problems confronting children than dogs. The following quote is for 2003 alone:
"Approximately 1,500 child deaths were related to abuse or neglect."

http://nccanch.acf.hhs.gov/topics/overview/sexualabuse.cfm

You seem more concerned with taking well-behaved dogs off responsible pet owners than doing something that will help far more children.

[Fair Go]

Do you have to resort to abuse? I suggest that neither I nor any of the other posters opposed to banning specific breeds of dogs have ever owned a dog that has harmed anyone. To accuse someone of pedophilia because they are opposed to governments seizing well-behaved pets is not only abusive, it is sick.

[Fair Go]

And where is the evidence that a pit bull was responsible? I suggest another example of unsubstantiated anti-dog propaganda.

[BJungNan]

And where is the evidence that a pit bull was responsible? I suggest another example of unsubstantiated anti-dog propaganda.

The little girl was in her own yard.

Should I animate it?

[BJungNan]

You seem more concerned with taking well-behaved dogs off responsible pet owners than doing something that will help far more children.

We are talking about pitbulls and the menace that they are. Don't change the subject.

[Fair Go]

You are wasting your time.

[Fair Go]

You obviously hate dogs and are hellbent on destroying animals that have never hurt you or anybody else so just get lost.

[BJungNan]

You obviously hate dogs and are hellbent on destroying animals that have never hurt you or anybody else so just get lost.

Lost dog. Now there is a solution.

[Fair Go]

Don't you ever learn?

[BJungNan]

Do you have to resort to abuse? I suggest that neither I nor any of the other posters opposed to banning specific breeds of dogs have ever owned a dog that has harmed anyone. To accuse someone of pedophilia because they are opposed to governments seizing well-behaved pets is not only abusive, it is sick.

You can keep trying to change the subject if you want but (1) as soon as I posted irrefutable horror of your position, you starting reaching for answers. It is just like someone that is for abortion being confronted with a picture of a baby in the womb - you can't handle the reality of your position.

The reality is that the dog that mauled that girl was someone's pet that thought it would never do such a thing.

[BJungNan]

Don't you ever learn?

What do I need to learn? Plastic surgery?

[BJungNan]

You obviously hate dogs and are hellbent on destroying animals that have never hurt you or anybody else so just get lost.

You want me to have more compasion for someone's right to own a known vicious breed than for that little girl. No way. Can't do it and can not understand how you can.

[Fair Go]

Don't you know the meaning of GET LOST?

[Fair Go]

At least the photograph is genuine, not like the doctored photographs of the alleged pit-bull victim below.

[BJungNan]

Don't you know the meaning of GET LOST?

1). You could not refute my point so you change the subject.

2). When you are caught changing the subject, you then suggest that I should get out of the thread.

3). I will not reply to you anymore, if that is what you mean. But, you have to let these words, my words here, be the last word.

[Fair Go]

GOOD!

[BJungNan]

I knew you could not let me have the last word. It is a darn good thing we are not married. The fights would go on for days. You get the dog house.

OK, good night.

[proud_yank]

I imagine that he could post a victim that was hit by an SUV too, those should be banned also.

Henry, the (vicious) Bearded Collie shown here in 'attack mode' on the left, we had to get rid of because he was a 'vicious dog'.



My Mother had him & Charlie (right) playing in a tennis court when a guy with a dog walked by. Henry jumped on the gate, it opened and he got into a fight with the dog. The guys shorts were ripped, but we didn't know by which one. My Mom reimbursed him for his shorts, and his dog's trip to the vet for 'checkup'. He still filed a complaint, and the restrictions were well beyond absurd, so we had to find him a new home.

Perhaps we should have sued the city for faulty public facilities. I don't think that a tennis court gate should be able to be opened by a dog, after all.

My Mom used to buy into a lot of the 'pitbull & vicious spin'. Not anymore, after this.

[Fair Go]

And I'd be glad to share the dog house with an alleged pit bull!