Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Alia; All

http://www.wral.com/news/9256654/detail.html

Defense Attorneys Seek Toxicology Reports On Accuser In Duke Case

UPDATED: 5:52 pm EDT May 22, 2006

DURHAM, N.C. -- Lawyers representing one of three Duke University lacrosse players charged with rape want details about any toxicology tests performed on the accuser, asking in a motion filed Monday whether such evidence even exists.

"No such toxicology report, if it exists, was provided to the defense," wrote attorneys Kirk Osborn and Ernest Conner, referring to nearly 1,300 pages of evidence prosecutors provided to defense attorneys last week.

The attorneys represent Reade Seligmann, one of three lacrosse players charged with raping a woman hired to perform as a stripper at a March 13 team party.

Seligmann's attorneys want a judge to order prosecutors to provide any reports "generated from blood, urine or other biological samples" collected from the accuser. In the motion, they cited a story published in Newsweek earlier this month that said District Attorney Mike Nifong "hinted" such tests would reveal the presence of a date-rape drug.

Authorities have said a doctor and specially trained nurse performed a physical exam on the accuser that found evidence of sexual assault. But the nurse who filled out a report on that exam indicated no toxicology tests were performed, according to the defense motion.

Nifong declined to comment.

Last week, Nifong gave defense attorneys 1,278 pages of evidence, along with two VCR tapes and a CD of photos.

In a second motion filed Monday, the attorneys said information was missing, including "a substantial portion" of a report on the sexual-assault exam.

"It is clear from the discovery provided that discovery in this matter is nowhere near complete," the motion states.

Osborn and Wade Smith, who represents Finnerty, said they had reviewed the evidence provided by Nifong. Smith declined to comment on its contents, but Osborn said he wasn't worried.

"I can say that, after reviewing all the discovery, there's nothing in there that causes us any concern," he said.


902 posted on 05/22/2006 3:13:57 PM PDT by maggief (and the dessert cart rolls on ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 901 | View Replies ]


To: maggief

Thank you, maggief. So WHO told WRAL that the tox test HAD BEEN DONE?


904 posted on 05/22/2006 3:16:01 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]

To: maggief
I'll try again. My earlier quote from the WRAL article says a test for date-rape WAS DONE. The article you posted says that a "tox" screen wasn't done on CGM at the hospital.

Is the "date-rape" screen not a part of the "tox" screen?

If it is, it tells me that she must have been lucid sufficient for SANE etc., to not think she'd been slipped "the" mickey.

906 posted on 05/22/2006 3:18:37 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson