Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke rape case set for 2007
Toronto Star ^ | May 19, 2006. 07:02 AM | staff

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:17:27 AM PDT by Perdogg

DURHAM, N.C.—One of three Duke University lacrosse players charged with rape wants the case resolved in time for the next school year, his lawyer said in court yesterday. But the judge warned he will not fast-track the proceedings.

The case "is not going to jump ahead of the line and be handled any differently," Superior Court Judge Ronald L. Stephens said at a hearing for sophomore Reade Seligmann.

After the brief hearing, District Attorney Mike Nifong said he does not expect any trial to begin before next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestar.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: benchavis; duke; dukelax; hanover; ncc; ncnb; nifong; noi; wachovia; wcc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,161 next last
To: Krodg
I find it interesting that defense counsel knew the phone had been disconnected the day after the alleged assault

and while alleging he has no idea what is on it.

301 posted on 05/19/2006 7:08:51 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
Hannity just had some more talking heads on. He has been insisting for some time that the boys are innocent. Colmes, however, latched on to a comment by one of the "experts" who said that if they find evidence of a date rape drug in her toxicology report, that would be huge. What I want to know is why? If there is no evidence of rape why would the presence of the date rape drug prove anything?
302 posted on 05/19/2006 7:12:32 PM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alia

So, if the DA hadn't shared discovery until yesterday, how did the defense know the service had been discontinued?


303 posted on 05/19/2006 7:13:29 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Begs the question--whose phone was it? Remember she said she wanted her cash and "her" phone back (which was somehow more expensive than a blackberry). Did the cops get the number to try to "call" it so they could find it in the house or yard?


304 posted on 05/19/2006 7:19:35 PM PDT by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

Comment #305 Removed by Moderator

To: Krodg
So, if the DA hadn't shared discovery until yesterday, how did the defense know the service had been discontinued?

Probably from reading these threads.

306 posted on 05/19/2006 7:21:44 PM PDT by NeonKnight (We don't believe you, you need more people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: demkicker

AMEN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


307 posted on 05/19/2006 7:27:26 PM PDT by FlowJo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Correction: Defense council meaning the Duke Lawyers. Time for sleepy nites... Nifong said he didn't know what was on the phone.


308 posted on 05/19/2006 7:28:04 PM PDT by Alia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: bjc
this is the behavior of a sociopath

I haven't observed Nifong's behavior enough to judge, but I would say that Elliot Spitzer is a sociopath based on what I've seen of him. Good point.

309 posted on 05/19/2006 7:29:53 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (Why isn't there an "NRA" for the rest of my rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 253 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

Their investigators probably called the number.


310 posted on 05/19/2006 7:36:08 PM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
I think the kids lawyers got some private investigators to find out about it. I think they already know who she called and when. They might have pictures of her on the phone. That would establish a time line they can compare to the pictures of her the boys took. It could be she was on the phone with her pimp or boyfriend when she was supposed to be getting raped in the bathroom. They might also have gotten some other records from the phone company that shows she was texting but not what she was texting.
311 posted on 05/19/2006 7:39:33 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

"So, if the DA hadn't shared discovery until yesterday, how did the defense know the service had been discontinued?"

Did the defense mention that the phone was disconnected before discovery?


312 posted on 05/19/2006 7:42:58 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: RecallMoran
Did the cops get the number to try to "call" it so they could find it in the house or yard?

It was 31 hours before she gave the cops a statement and the DA didn't turn over their evidence until yesterday...How did the defense know?

313 posted on 05/19/2006 7:53:33 PM PDT by Krodg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
By dragging this case out NiFOGG costs the families tons of money. He can survive the general elecltion with no problem at all, and he can decide at the last minute that the girl is too traumatized to testify. In the meantime the families have been dragged thru hell.

When they aren't busy drunkenly sucking snot up their sodden noses, this is what the "legal profession" calls "justice."

After they clumsily wipe themselves, they will say "See? The system works."

314 posted on 05/19/2006 7:54:31 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Krodg
Ha, that was the first question I asked hubby after the hearing. Assumed that when the guys found the phone in the front yard and brought it inside, one of them tried it after it had been disconnected that day.

As no other ho's had probably fallen down in their yard in the past days and spilled their ho bags, they assumed it was the FA and turned it over to the cops when they came a callin.

315 posted on 05/19/2006 7:59:22 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Krodg

How do we know that the defense already knew the phone had been disconnected?


316 posted on 05/19/2006 8:02:30 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: ltc8k6

Osborn said in the hearing, the phone was disconnected the day after and they need to know the provider and salvage all the info, etc.


317 posted on 05/19/2006 8:06:22 PM PDT by Rheo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]

To: All; Alia; Krodg

To: Krodg
I find it interesting that defense counsel knew the phone had been disconnected the day after the alleged assault
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

Judge Stephens HINTED that the phone was owned by a third party. The Defense has investigators. Suppose a Defense investigator greased some palms at the Escort agency and they gave the Defense the phone number they used to contact the AV.
The Defense would have no problem seeing whom that number was registered too.


318 posted on 05/19/2006 8:08:15 PM PDT by Mike Nifong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Rheo

Ho, ho, ho


319 posted on 05/19/2006 8:08:49 PM PDT by RecallMoran (Recall Brodhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Rheo

The day of the hearing, yes. Did the defense say it before that day?


320 posted on 05/19/2006 8:10:03 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340 ... 1,161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson