Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Duke rape case set for 2007
Toronto Star ^ | May 19, 2006. 07:02 AM | staff

Posted on 05/19/2006 7:17:27 AM PDT by Perdogg

DURHAM, N.C.—One of three Duke University lacrosse players charged with rape wants the case resolved in time for the next school year, his lawyer said in court yesterday. But the judge warned he will not fast-track the proceedings.

The case "is not going to jump ahead of the line and be handled any differently," Superior Court Judge Ronald L. Stephens said at a hearing for sophomore Reade Seligmann.

After the brief hearing, District Attorney Mike Nifong said he does not expect any trial to begin before next year.

(Excerpt) Read more at thestar.com ...


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: benchavis; duke; dukelax; hanover; ncc; ncnb; nifong; noi; wachovia; wcc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,161 next last
To: OldFriend

As soon as that whore made the false accusations (I'm making a education guess here as to her honesty) against the young men she effectively ruined their lives regardless of any outcome of a trial or dropped charges.


161 posted on 05/19/2006 11:40:11 AM PDT by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JLS

This is a silly debate. A payoff would ruin these kids life. Their lawyers, should, however, explore every technicality that might cause the case to fail before trial.

As the priest/counsellor said the other day: do not demand that someone open the door for for you when your cage only has three sides.


162 posted on 05/19/2006 11:44:48 AM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: ZULU
I think that woman and Nilfang had some kind of relationship and he knows she will spill the beans on him if he doesn't cooperate with her.

I hadn't heard that before, but if it's true that rattlesnake was the one to plea bargain her previous case, then you just may be right.

163 posted on 05/19/2006 11:45:36 AM PDT by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Locomotive Breath

I agree that statement holds some merit. A learned trait that all humans can gain from is that of personal responsibility. Law is only the vehicle to be used in holding folks accountable for the choices they make.

Enforcement is the key. We should use it more often.


164 posted on 05/19/2006 11:48:28 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 160 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18

6 month's wait for a major trial is reasonable. More than 8 months is pushing it.


165 posted on 05/19/2006 11:58:13 AM PDT by stands2reason (You cannot bully or insult any conservative into voting for your guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: David Allen
There is no way these two women make it to year's end without blowing it.

They both should be doing hard time right now--the accuser for trying to run down a cop, and the accessory for imbezzlement.

166 posted on 05/19/2006 11:59:24 AM PDT by Rider on the Rain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: stands2reason

I agree, I think 6 months would be reasonable also.


167 posted on 05/19/2006 12:18:49 PM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: thinkthenpost
$400,000.00 bond each is not running loose.

But they are still out on the streets, able to put on their rape hoodies at night and go out and rape other women and leave no DNA trace. The only reason Nifong knows about these criminal masterminds is that they messed up and hired their victim. (/sarcasm)

168 posted on 05/19/2006 12:18:51 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Rider on the Rain

Oh, but they're the victims here!! They were on their way home from the Women's Prayer Group meeting, where they were planning a food drive for the poor, when these bad white men jumped them and made them do terrible things!

I said from day one the "DNA" would end up being her boyfriend's.


169 posted on 05/19/2006 12:20:09 PM PDT by David Allen (the presumption of innocence - what a concept!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
I know that Nifong won a Democrat primary with no opposing Republican. Does that make it too late for someone to mount a write-in campaign during the general election? He still has to win a general election, right? Isn't he really the presumptive winner now, or will they not have a general election for his position because no Republican opposed him in the primary?

Is he delaying this trial until 2007 because he knows he can still lose his job in November if it all hits the fan before then, or is his job secure?

-PJ

170 posted on 05/19/2006 12:22:44 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rider on the Rain
I think that woman and Nilfang had some kind of relationship and he knows she will spill the beans on him if he doesn't cooperate with her. I hadn't heard that before, but if it's true that rattlesnake was the one to plea bargain her previous case, then you just may be right.

I have heard that suggested but it sounds too much like a movie script to me. I just think he sees this as his ticket to election in Nov (he was appointed) and his 15 min of fame. Plus, the defense lawyers will find out if that is what's going on- Durham is not a very big place.

171 posted on 05/19/2006 12:28:18 PM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too
I know that Nifong won a Democrat primary with no opposing Republican. Does that make it too late for someone to mount a write-in campaign during the general election? He still has to win a general election, right? Isn't he really the presumptive winner now, or will they not have a general election for his position because no Republican opposed him in the primary? Is he delaying this trial until 2007 because he knows he can still lose his job in November if it all hits the fan before then, or is his job secure?

You don't run against the opposing party in a primary. The sole purpose is to determine who does run against the other guys. He was in a primary against 2 other Dems and won it. He is the presumed winner in the DA's race b/c there is no one running for the Republicans. I did read somewhere that another party could still register candidacy by June (30th?) and run against him in Nov.

172 posted on 05/19/2006 12:32:54 PM PDT by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: LWalk18

Well I'm hoping that there will be a change if venue. Some of the people from Durham believe that they are guilty, and as one said (paraphrased), even if they're not guilty they should pay for past injustices.

Justice will not be well served if the trial(s) are held in Durham.


173 posted on 05/19/2006 12:56:03 PM PDT by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski
I just think he sees this as his ticket to election in Nov (he was appointed) and his 15 min of fame.

Judges have to get elected too. Nifong probably isn't the only one that is going to be looking out for himself.

174 posted on 05/19/2006 12:58:49 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane
Well I'm hoping that there will be a change if venue.

I think the defense hopes to hell there will be one too. I don't think we will see that happen till after November 7th if you know what I mean.

175 posted on 05/19/2006 1:03:16 PM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 173 | View Replies]

To: pepperhead

From the local Durham TV station board, from the HIGH HORSE, dripping with sanctimony, the holy ones protesting underage drinking yesterday:

http://forums.go.com/abclocal/WTVD/thread?threadID=117602

"Side Stories at the Lacrosse Case
Author: DurhamTRY

"My husband (Earl) and I (Wanda) were 2 of the sign carrying folks. We were briefly seen on the news last night. We thank ABC 11 for being one of the few media present to take us seriously. Underage drinking is our cause. If underage drinking wasn't involved, we might not have a Lacrosse issue to discuss. Local stats: Did you know that 44% of HS students drink alcohol and 22% of MS students drink alcohol? There was a 2nd alleged rape on Duke's campus about 3 weeks ago (?) 5,000 teens lose their lives in alcohol related automobile accidents each year. We've heard of 6 recently in the news but there have been others.

We want to help save lives. We want your help. Contact us for strategies on how to do just that.

I really do want to hear what you think of this issue as well. According to Ralph Hingson, School of Public Health, Boston University, (each year) “600,000 students are assaulted by another student who's been drinking;70,000 are victims of date rape; 100,000 say they were too drunk to know whether the sex they had was consensual.
Posted: 5/19/06 1:57 PM "

I kid you not. There really are protesters against everything.


176 posted on 05/19/2006 1:18:56 PM PDT by OrinocoJack (Free the Ham Sammich! Disbar Nifong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: luv2ski
That's my point. People treated his Dem primary win as the de facto win because there was no Republican running in the primary. However, there is still the general election, and if he is unopposed there then he wins. But is it a foregone conclusion that he will be unopposed?

Someone can still mount an independent campaign against him (perhaps even a Republican as a write-in), so he has a motive to keep this case going past the November election, which is why I think he wants to push the trial into 2007.

Since this is a county race, why can't someone mount a last-minute campaign against him, since the voting population is so small? That person could leverage mounting disgust if it appears that the case is becoming politically motivated and that the defendants have alibis.

-PJ

177 posted on 05/19/2006 1:34:47 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (It's still not safe to vote Democrat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 172 | View Replies]

To: OrinocoJack
I always liked the fact that MADD (Mothers Against Drunk Driving) had a counter-protest group called DAMM (Drunks Against Mad Mothers). These new prohibitionists are getting out of hand.
178 posted on 05/19/2006 1:36:18 PM PDT by Locomotive Breath (In the shuffling madness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 176 | View Replies]

To: Peach; Howlin

Yale Galenter just told Abrams that according to the discovery info turned over yesterday, the accuser was asked at the hospital whether her attackers wore condoms and she said "No."


179 posted on 05/19/2006 1:41:32 PM PDT by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

If Freda Black could not beat Nifong, no write in candidate could, barring an end to the lacrosse persectuion. His local power base is too strong.


180 posted on 05/19/2006 1:41:54 PM PDT by streeeetwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 1,161 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson