Posted on 05/16/2006 10:28:26 AM PDT by Republicanprofessor
When the then-34-year-old architect won the ground-zero-memorial competition, he looked like the Maya Lin of 9/11a bright, shining star out of nowhere who would build a breathtaking new landmark. Two years later, all weve got is a pile of dirt, a price estimate nearing $1 billion, and a nasty, behind-the-scenes war of wills.
When Michael Arad unveiled his winning design for the World Trade Center Memorial, the last person New York wanted to hear from was another architect. It was January 2004, by which point the ground-zero rebuilding effort had devolved into a grating public spectacle of political bullying and grief-mongering. The Lower Manhattan Development Corporation, the city-state agency charged with rebuilding the site, had abjectly failed to control the process, and the fierce bickering over Daniel Libeskinds Freedom Tower looked certain to result in an epic compromise that nobody would be satisfied with. Design, it seemed, couldnt create unity; it led only to intractable differences of taste.
(Excerpt) Read more at nymag.com ...
Here are some pictures of what Arad envisions.
Is it just me or has every one of these designs, for the memorial and the new buildings, been completely uninspiring?
It is too bad that there is so much back-biting. There should be a pulling together to get the memorial and new WTC built; not selfish in-fighting on who gets the credit for what.
Art ping.
Let Sam Cree, Woofie, or me know if you want on or off this art ping list.
I'm tired of it. Where's the Mc Donalds?
I like Arad's concept. A shame it all seems to be coming undone.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.