Skip to comments.
Trouble ahead for the American middle class
Free Republic
| may 16, 2006
| jim shirreffs
Posted on 05/16/2006 9:05:47 AM PDT by jpsb
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
To: jpsb
"Ever wonder why the rich want to flood the usa with uneducated poor from totarian nations?"
Hmm... tot-arian nations would be those that are run by infants?
41
posted on
05/16/2006 9:44:40 AM PDT
by
ketelone
To: jpsb
It's worth noting that these industries in which "only a handful of companies compete" are actually among the
least profitable industries in the U.S.
One of the defining characteristics of the U.S. over the last 50-60 years is that small companies generally offer far better growth potential than large ones.
42
posted on
05/16/2006 9:44:58 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: jpsb
Shiny side out, shiny side out - the tinfoil hat should be shiny side out...
43
posted on
05/16/2006 9:46:27 AM PDT
by
talleyman
(Kerry & the Surrender-Donkey Treasoncrats - trashing the troops for 40 years.)
To: Centurion2000
The Republican Party is the party of the middle class not, as the Democrats would have it, "the party of the rich." The richest senators are Democrats, the owners of newspapers are Democrats, and Warren Buffet and Bill Gates and other limo liberals are Democrats. Limo liberals definitely do use the Democratic Party to wield the poor (defined as anyone who is willing to be patronized as "poor" by rich Democrats) against the middle class.
44
posted on
05/16/2006 9:47:44 AM PDT
by
conservatism_IS_compassion
(The idea around which liberalism coheres is that NOTHING actually matters except PR.)
To: Alberta's Child
Most societies had a small middle class. It was mainly the professionals that the wealthy needed. Doctors, lawyers, priests, etc, and merchants in societies that allow merchants.However these (merchants) were purged from time to time should they gain to much wealth.
45
posted on
05/16/2006 9:48:10 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: Rippin
The cost of health care is killing the middle class . . . This is really a myth. What is "killing the middle class" is that our expectations for health care far exceed our ability to pay for it.
46
posted on
05/16/2006 9:48:39 AM PDT
by
Alberta's Child
(Can money pay for all the days I lived awake but half asleep?)
To: jpsb
Very interesting and truthful.
In researching history, one thing that pops out at me is that the various "red" revolutions, from France to Russia to Spain, all came from the dissatisfied upper crust and lower class, and often went against the middle class.
Similar trends are shaping up here.
47
posted on
05/16/2006 9:50:59 AM PDT
by
redgolum
("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
To: Lunatic Fringe
Haven't you heard? Since Chicago outlawed goose pate, the super rich are eating the livers of middle class children.
48
posted on
05/16/2006 9:53:54 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: A. Pole
Workers overseas are cheaper because their cost (and standard) of living is lower. In other words, they gouge the American public much less than American workers.
49
posted on
05/16/2006 9:54:15 AM PDT
by
mc6809e
To: Alberta's Child
This is really a myth. What is "killing the middle class" is that our expectations for health care far exceed our ability to pay for it. O.K., how about the way we pay for health care is damaging competitiveness and depressing wages and discouraging entrepreneurism, and discouraging legal hires, and causing the middle class to be dissatisfied with decent wages when they have no health benefits. It will soon be close to 20% of GDP. Too much.
50
posted on
05/16/2006 9:54:42 AM PDT
by
Rippin
To: jpsb
Only a hand full of companies now "compete" in many industries. Take the oil industry as an example. That's funny. I think Exxon/Mobil has 8% of the gas market in the US. No competition there.
51
posted on
05/16/2006 9:56:21 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: redgolum
"In researching history, one thing that pops out at me is that the various "red" revolutions, from France to Russia to Spain, all came from the dissatisfied upper crust and lower class, and often went against the middle class. "
Yes that is exactly right and it is true of the freer societies of the ancient world also.
52
posted on
05/16/2006 9:56:46 AM PDT
by
jpsb
To: WhiteGuy
Very thoughtful. It is, if you're a class-warfare Democrat.
Or a Bircher.
53
posted on
05/16/2006 9:57:56 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
To: ketelone
Hmm... tot-arian nations would be those that are run by infants? ROFLMAO!!!
54
posted on
05/16/2006 10:02:27 AM PDT
by
sinkspur
( OK. You've had your drink. Now why don't you tell your Godfather what everybody else already knows?)
To: jpsb
You misidentify the ruling class, a common mistake. It isn't the super rich but what James Burnham called the managerial class, the bureaucrats in the government, academia, and, above all, the medias. The self-described intellectual elite. Most are upper-middle class, though some may be filthy rich. Certainly a large part of their motivation is the never ending struggle to prove their moral and intellectual superiority over the middle class and to separate themselves from that dreaded swamp. It is more about status than wealth. Someone posted an
essay by Tom Wolfe that has some interesting points on this subject.
55
posted on
05/16/2006 10:05:34 AM PDT
by
jordan8
To: 1rudeboy
The Heritage Foundation? Nothing from EPI showing wages have dropped 30% since 1972?
56
posted on
05/16/2006 10:05:59 AM PDT
by
Toddsterpatriot
(Why are protectionists so bad at math?)
To: mc6809e
In other words, they gouge the American public much less than American workers. American workers ARE the American public. Higher wages mean higher standard of living and bigger consumer market.
Economy is not a zero sum game - lower wages can lead to the contraction of economy and lower profits for the well off.
57
posted on
05/16/2006 10:06:07 AM PDT
by
A. Pole
(GWB believes that "guest worker" program will satisfy economy needs for cheap and plentiful labour.)
To: jpsb
It is my understanding that many millions in Asia are becomming wealthy via manurfacturing. Am I mistaken? No, I never said that you were. But I guarantee you that it's not the average line worker.
Am I mistaken that millions have become wealthy, perhaps many tens of millions, and again, depending upon our definition of "wealthy," in the service sector/industry?
Have you seen government pay scales recently as well?
Either way, I'm sure that if we use the definition of "wealthy" that you apply to chinese manufacturing workers and managers, my side of this argument will fare extremely well.
58
posted on
05/16/2006 10:06:16 AM PDT
by
Fruitbat
To: Rippin
The cost of health care is killing the middle class and its all government generated in one way or another. Employers are absorbing much of the increase in the cost of benefits, especially healthcare, which is why total compensation for all workers is increasing.
See post #35 for a better description.
59
posted on
05/16/2006 10:13:31 AM PDT
by
Mase
To: jpsb
The wealthy in this country have nothing to gain from destroying the middle class.Nothing! Quite the opposite is true,in fact.
The "victims" of this country,almost all of whom vote democRAT,believe that they do.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 141-149 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson