Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Tarheel
There is NO WAY that Nifong or she can escape from testifying in court! Going into hysterics will not be sufficient "testimony" of her frailty and dismissing the case.

Judge Napolitano is still insisting that Nifong must have 'something." HA

327 posted on 05/15/2006 11:10:13 AM PDT by Carolinamom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]


To: Carolinamom

Nap: "Your client may say something that could be used against him later."

Right, Nappy. Like Nifong is going to use the TRUTH against David Evans.


330 posted on 05/15/2006 11:11:20 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: All
Napolitano also say the accused shouldn't say anything.
333 posted on 05/15/2006 11:11:56 AM PDT by pepperhead (Kennedy's float, Mary Jo's don't!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: Carolinamom

Judge N presumes overmuch. It appears to be a minimal, absolutely minumal amount of a ragtag case that Nifong put to a GJ just eager to do whatever he wants.


336 posted on 05/15/2006 11:13:36 AM PDT by txrangerette ("We are fighting al-Qaeda, NOT Aunt Sadie"...Dick Cheney commenting on the wiretaps!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

To: Carolinamom
There is NO WAY that Nifong or she can escape from testifying in court! Going into hysterics will not be sufficient "testimony" of her frailty and dismissing the case.

Since Nifong was directly involved in the investigation, he cannot avoid testifying if called by the defense.

501 posted on 05/15/2006 11:59:45 AM PDT by connectthedots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson