Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

"Ahem, she's already given sworn testimony under oath. Twice."

In this case?


1,363 posted on 05/15/2006 10:36:50 PM PDT by marajade (Yes, I'm a SW freak!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1351 | View Replies ]


To: marajade
In this case?

Certainly you don't think Nifong was dumb enough to get search warrants without a sworn statement, do you?

And her lineup ID HAD to be under oath.

UNDER PENALTY OF LAW.

You should know that drill.

1,368 posted on 05/15/2006 10:39:00 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies ]

To: marajade
When accusers give statements, they are all signed as being "truthful and subject to the laws of perjury" by the accuser. Ever given a deposition? You are sworn in at the time.

Things like the SANE report are what I have a problem with. The mere fact of why it is being done puts a weight to it. The SANE person assumes that the victim is telling the truth and that tips the scale right from the beginning. If Crystal lied about recent sex via a "boyfriend", the SANE report conclusion has no merit to convict.

1,466 posted on 05/16/2006 4:34:14 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1363 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson