I have to think about this supposition some more. (My brain is flashing on black lights -- any sticky would sure show up under a black light.) So, possibly the "sex" was part of the planned "operation" on the Duke Boys? Is that what you are thinking?
It might be time to pull up Howlin's timeline post and re-look at the timeline.
I am just trying to throw out possible scenarios.
On Pelvic examiniation the notes would say something like:
1.Blah ,blah, blah with a moderate amount of seminal fluid suggestive of recent sexual activity
2. Tears & laverations noted and description of those to indicate age
3.Anything else determined by protocol
At the end of the physical exam it would say :
Impression: (Whatever physical observations) consistent with sexual assault
It will not say a rape definitiely occured.
That is why it is so important for the defense to get the actual hospital record. It is the only way they will get the complete picture.
In a nutshell, if we were to only see the report we see that she had injuries consistent with a sexual assualt. Reading the entire report the lawyers will see things Nifong did not want them to see.