We thought that because in the first defense DNA press conference they stated that the report indicated there was no DNA in or on her body from anyone to indicate any sex had taken place, period....
Of course. Threads cannot not be held responsible for absent or badly "dis-semen-inated" information.
Teach you to pay too much attention to press conferences. The "newsies" down there already thought the DNA was going to ID a third attacker ~ that's because they, too, listened too closely to the press conference evidentiary hearings (by both the defense and the prosecution).
Be interesting to see what these tests actually demonstrate when they, themselves, are made public. What we have here, so far, is yet another press conference held by a defense lawyer.