I don't know about her DNA.
To my knowledge, the ID discrepancy is outstanding and unchanged.
These kids are getting screwed, big time.
I'm late to the game, but Looking over the ID transcript,,
This is why someone NOT involved in the investigation is
supposed to admister the ID procedure.
Look how the Main investigator gets HIS answer from the
AV:
Image 26
Victim:
He was in the Living Room
Sgt:
He was in the Living Room?
Victim:
Sitting down.
Sgt:
Do you recognize him? I'M SORRY, YOU SAID HE WAS IN THE LIVING ROOM?
Victim:
I meant the Master Bedroom
The Lead Investigator (Sgt) led the AV right into his answer. Otherwise, she'd look confused and her story would conflict. He's keeping her on track.
That's why the Policy says to use someone NOT INVOLVED in the investigation to admister the ID process.