Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Protect the Bill of Rights

Using "tissue" hoping one will think the specimen was a chunk or slice of skin is misleading if, in fact,the scraping, material, whatever consisted of a few cells
___________________________________________________________

Exactly:

1. The "tissue" at issue is human tissue or else it would not have a human DNA profile to compare to that of the players.

2. It is such a small sample they could not find a strand of DNA with 13 markers.

3. The feminazis and the DA's office is saying tissue to get the public to think it is evidence of scratching.



272 posted on 05/12/2006 12:38:18 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

To liven things up we need one of the 3 guy's girlfriends to come out and say she changed her press on nails there a week before the incident and threw the old set in the trash can.


273 posted on 05/12/2006 12:44:14 PM PDT by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

To: JLS
What we should be hearing is: DNA MATERIAL was found under the victim's nails (and I mean real her real nails unless she said: Hey boys, STOP, I lost a nail!!

We shouldn't be hearing the words: tissue, wastebasket, or fake nails. Tissues are associated with bathrooms. Wastebaskets are contaminated. The fake nail was not ON THE OWNER of the nail. The defense attorney said it was unused. That's proveable.

275 posted on 05/12/2006 12:54:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson