Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS

Seems the "prior sexual history" limitation will be overlooked since DNA from another person is in the new report. How can that be overlooked? Once that report is introduced, shouldn't the source of that DNA become fair game for the defense?


1,427 posted on 05/13/2006 9:35:24 AM PDT by TommyDale (North Carolina looks forward to the disbarring of Mike Nifong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1117 | View Replies ]


To: TommyDale; All

What is a pimp be charged with? Solicitation?


1,431 posted on 05/13/2006 9:40:28 AM PDT by Protect the Bill of Rights
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1427 | View Replies ]

To: TommyDale
Absolutely...DNA from another person "in this case" is material evidence. She and her boyfriend may be guilty of a crime, particularly because she lied and he knew it.

"To tell the truth" is not what the oath says: It says to tell the truth, the WHOLE truth and nothing but the truth. It was written that way for a very particular reason.

1,434 posted on 05/13/2006 9:42:56 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1427 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson