I have a problem with them taking the DNA of all 46 boys to start with just because it probably would produce say 6 matching markers to start with.
I agree; and it seems against their civil rights.
If the false accuser initially told police/Nifong that she had sex with her boyfriend, how could Nifong tell a judge that a non-testimonial court order compelling the entire team to provide DNA samples would definitely prove which players were innocent and which were guilty?
Nifong obviously believed the semen retrieved was that of the players, because she convinced him she had been with no one consensually.