Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: freakboy

true...there is a hue and cry from muslems. So we should be (are) better then them.

This story is a work of FICTION, and nothing else.


14 posted on 05/11/2006 2:36:57 PM PDT by Vaquero ("An armed society is a polite society" Robert A. Heinlein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Vaquero
"true...there is a hue and cry from muslems. So we should be (are) better then them."

Seen any Christian riots yet regarding this movie? We ARE better than them. And we have a perfect right to point out forcefully that this movie is untrue and that serious Christians probably should not finance it by buying tickets. What's wrong with that?

22 posted on 05/11/2006 2:39:16 PM PDT by Irene Adler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero
"This story is a work of FICTION, and nothing else."

You are correct. However, so was National Treasure (with Nicholas Cage). I can't say I went out and researched a lot of the background facts they put in that movie, but the ones that made sense, I believed to be true. I believe the Silence Dogood letters exist, even though I had never heard of them before seeing the movie.

Couldn't some folks go into the DaVinci Code and come out with the same new-found knowledge?

Not to mention those who despise Christianity and organized religion - who will use 'facts' gleaned from this movie just as liberals did with "Farenheit 9/11", to attack and to hate.

Not that I'm a big moviegoer. The only movie I've gone to in the past 3 years was Ice Age 2. And the next one will be Pixar's Cars. (Unless they screen that Andy Garcia anti-Castro flick out here in the midwest. I want to see that.) My 4-year-old isn't a big Tom Hanks fan, anyway. :) (well, except for Sheriff Woody from Toy Story)

I know it's fiction, but I'm not discounting Code as a tool for those who revile my faith and morality to spew mistruths against me.

107 posted on 05/11/2006 4:00:32 PM PDT by RabidBartender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: Vaquero
This story is a work of FICTION, and nothing else.

Of course it's fiction, but the author of the book claims it's based on verifiable facts. A statement to that effect is printed in the forward of the book, and every word of it is a flat out lie.

His book is not only diabolical fiction, it's an intentional, direct attack on the faith of new or experienced but weak Christians who aren't well grounded in the truth of the biblical Gospel message. Already many such people are going to their priests or pastors saying that they no can longer believe in the divinity of Christ or the veracity of holy scripture. And that's not to mention the thousands of people who were on the verge of becoming Christians, but who are now confused and unsure of what to believe about Jesus Christ and his church. That is exactly what the atheist enemies of Christ and his church wanted to see happen when this book was published, and it is happening in every nook and corner of the US.

It's a free country, or so I hear, and Mr. Brown is free to write just about anything he chooses and Hanks can defend Brown's lies and slanderous attacks on the church and it's divine Head to his heart's content. But don't expect those of us to whom Jesus Christ is not only God incarnate but also the most important and beloved human being to ever walk on planet earth to cheerfully go along with the unchurched crowd and applaud a book and film which defames the holy character and profanes the name of the resurrected Son of God who willingly gave his life by way of a horribly brutal Roman crucifixion to save other men and women from eternal death.

But even if Jesus Christ had not been who he claimed to be, but only an outstandlingly good man who had more influence for good in the world than any other human who ever lived, Brown's lies would still be reprehensible. Would any respectable author write a slanderous attack piece disguised as a novel about some great humanitarian such as Dr. M.L. King or Albert Schweitzer, fully intending to cause it's readers to lose faith in those men's character and virtues? I don't think so, and if he or she did the people would reject it out of hand. Why is it that a slanderous attack on Jesus Christ's divinity and a pack of vicious lies about his church is the entertainment coup of the decade, while another book and film attacking another great but lesser man would not make the tiniest splash in the public's collective mind? Maybe it's because the proposition that there really is a higher authority than man's own fallible human mind, and that men and women will eventually be held accountable for their deeds and misdeeds by that authority is too frightening to contemplate for those who live only for their own pleasure and benefit.

172 posted on 05/11/2006 9:52:16 PM PDT by epow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson