Posted on 05/11/2006 1:24:06 PM PDT by quidnunc
There's no other major item most of us own that is as confusing, unpredictable and unreliable as our personal computers. Everybody has questions about them, and we aim to help.
Here are a few questions about computers I've received recently from people like you, and my answers. I have edited and restated the questions a bit, for readability. This week my mailbox contained a question about security software for Macs.
If you have a question, send it to me at mossberg@wsj.com, and I may select it to be answered here in Mossberg's Mailbox.
Q: There's been a lot of press lately about increased virus activity on the Macintosh platform. Should Mac owners now be running the same kinds of security software that Windows owners use?
A: There is no sudden security crisis on the Apple Macintosh platform. In fact, for average Mac users, there isn't a security threat of any significance, at least not yet. It is laughable to compare the real, massive and burdensome security problems on Windows with the largely theoretical security problem on the Mac.
As I have said in the past, no operating system is invulnerable to attack, including Apple's Mac OS X operating system, which powers Macintosh computers. It is possible to write malicious software for the Mac, including viruses and spyware, and it is possible for this software to spread in the wild, infecting many Macs.
-snip-
(Excerpt) Read more at ptech.wsj.com ...
post system specs and price of a mac, and I will produce a better PC version for less.
They are brand loyal because they believe the marketing and they keep trying to justify the price they paid.
YOu should not buy a Mac because they are not worth the extra money. Go out and buy four PCs. In case on of them gets a dibilitating virus that renders it useless, you still have three more PC's as back up.
That is the absurdity of the my Mac won't get a virus claim.
You liked that one did you. I've got a few more at the office parked on my Mac. I need to upload and post them.
You forgot to include me! Or don't Mac users trolling for Mac threads count?
You forgot to include me! Or don't Mac users trolling for Mac threads count?
Photoshop, Illustrator, Acrobat, Quark, Roundhouse, MS Office for Mac, IE for Mac...mainly...
Given a set of specs, I'm sure you could build a trailer home that is cheaper than an equivalent house. But you'd still be living in a trailer.
Computer platform choice is experiential, just as cars, homes, and any other consumer choice is really decided by how people "experience" the use of what they buy.
Heck, your trolling on Mac threads is pointless. You do it for the non-tangible pleasure you get out of getting a rise out of people. I've told you before that this is sick and demented behavior, yet you continue unabashed and unabated.
Compared to you, Mac users who mind their own business, stick to their own threads, and generally support one another with positive contributions are a Godsend. You? You're just an annoying prick with too much time on your hands.
LOL!
I haven't seen you be as fanatic about being an insulting prick as Echo Talon. He does it for no reason other than the joy of pissing off strangers.
its usually common courtesy to ping someone when you talk sh*t about them, but then again... you're an iProduct.
More ignorance, Echo. It has less to do with CFM (although that is part of the equation) and more to do with timing... adjusting the speed and airflow when its needed. The Apple G5 case is designed to flow air where its needed and the fans are under constant control of the computer to maximize cooling as it is needed... not just to run continually or always at the same velocity.
PING - you're a prick.
You're a useless, non-contributing member of this thread. :-)
From a name brand manufacturer?
Linux is a nice OS. It lacks some of the polish of the Mac OS, but in terms of user experience, Linux is not only usable but easy to use for basic, everyday activities.
The only thing Linux is missing is adoption by a major OS developer, just as Apple adopted FreeBSD Unix. Apple's adoption of FreeBSD has injected a lot of fuel and energy into the Open Source community, and Linux has benefited from the attention.
I've also found the Open Source icon developers to be much better than your average OS icon developers on both Mac and Windows. Some of the icon sets for Linux are beautiful.
But YellowDog on my 350Mhz B&W is rather slow. You may have to tweak your installation to get the right mix of performance and applications. But it works, and most of the problem I think with performance is the fact that I only have a little less than 300 MB of memory. I have a suspicion that performance would increase by leaps and bounds if I went out and bought more memory.
Sure.
Kind of like the AMD "cool&Quiet technology" ?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.