Note the pix of A pit bull. And then that it says "it MAY have been a pit bull". With the limited information, it sounds like they're jumping to conclusions and simultaneously pushing a theory on us in this short memo.
Somehow, I doubt it was a pit bull if the man has no evidence of bites! Maybe some dog threatened him and he had cardiac arrest?
To: HairOfTheDog
2 posted on
05/11/2006 9:01:49 AM PDT by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: the OlLine Rebel; Flyer; technochick99; sinkspur; 88keys; DugwayDuke; sissyjane; Severa; ...
Strange story... dog attack but no bite wounds - it does sound like a heart attack or something else. I do note some uncertainty in the article about the dog, but a picture of a dog with the article. Is this the dog? or a stock photo? weird.
Ping!
Other articles with keyword "DOGGIEPING" since 12/29/04
To: the OlLine Rebel
It 'may have been' a pit bull.
Who wants to bet!
10 posted on
05/11/2006 10:48:09 AM PDT by
RushCrush
(There is nothing more unattractive than a Democrat.)
To: the OlLine Rebel
>Bob Hampshire, of Calvert County Public Safety, says the victim had no visible bite wounds.<
Somebody is reaching here. Are you sure this didn't take place at Duke University?
12 posted on
05/11/2006 11:05:16 AM PDT by
Darnright
(You knew the job was dangerous when you took it, Fred.)
To: the OlLine Rebel
No bite marks plus anti-coagulants?
Most likely a cerebral bleed, a stroke (from a clot thrown from the atrium), or an MI from fright....
15 posted on
05/11/2006 8:53:10 PM PDT by
tracer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson