Posted on 05/11/2006 6:19:27 AM PDT by rwilson99
I'm ok with this FWIW. Remember that the south in general, and certainly, as we have read here as related to this case, Durham, still is very conscious of race. There is still an undercurrent of the bad old days when blacks better do as they're told, especially by a police officer or official, whether it seems to be on the level or not.
I agree that the State AG needs to do something here. As somebody wrote on the other thread, this prosecution is long past the point where it looks like something out of Nigeria or Haiti.
Durham: District Attorney Nifong today arrested a 6 year old girl on charges of failing to obtain a license to sell lemonade in front of her house. Nifong asked the court to remand the girl without the possibility of bail.
Detectives for Nifong grilled the girl for over three days under heat lamps while repeatedly exposing her to looped Nifong campaign speeches in attempting to gain a confession.
Nifong has also arrested the girl's parents, siblings and grandparents on charges of aiding and abetting a known criminal.
Nifong has indicated he may seek the death and dismemberment penalty when the case comes to trial in six years, just after his next re-election cycle.
a WTF ping...
I'm surprised this made the news. This is just typical prosecutor witness intimidation that happens everywhere. It's probably gone on forever, but it has gotten worse in recent decades as the war on drugs is turning us into a country of informants, with paid witnesses and witnesses in serious trouble who will do or say anything to save themselves. Prosecutors have gotten used to having threats hanging over the heads of their witnesses because they have this advantage in so many of their cases these days. They'll look for a way to do that in any case because it helps ensure a favorable outcome for them. I don't think it would be fair to say that they always or even most of the time demand witnesses lie for them, but they will demand the "truth" and the witnesses facing big trouble figure out that if they want to save their own rear ends the "truth" is whatever police and prosecutors want it to be.
I am seeing and reading more and more about this prosocutorial misconduct occuring in other states and municipalities as well. How can we, as citizens, respond to and/or correct this type of situation? We are supposed to be able to seek redress of our grievences per the constitution. How do we do it?
How about Calyso Louie? :)
This is one of the craziest arrest I have ever heard about. This is witness intimidation, in my opinion. This guy did nothing wrong 2 years ago, in fact, he was very helpful in helping the police find the guilty parties. There needs to be a local big-time lawyer to come forward, and take this guy's case without charge.
---I'm surprised this made the news. This is just typical prosecutor witness intimidation that happens everywhere.---
Yes, but what's interesting is that in this case it takes place in the glare of the national spotlight.
How about this guy?
http://www.williegary.com/
Nevermind, he's trying to woo the AV.
Sure Banks = Rich white kids got it /s
Computers crash ans lose data all the time. The copies that the defense team have are phtoshopped. Since no original records exist, the defense has no evidence.
TheDA is after this guy either because he's a witness or because he's black, which is it?
filing
Especially given the actual thief already pleaded guilty one would imagine the case was closed.
rwilson99, don't waste your time responding. wtc911's just looking for a fight.
I was thinking of moving down to Durham. My company has a branch there, and there are a lot of nice old houses in Durham with preservation credits and tax abatements available. Living would be a heck of a lot cheaper than in suburban NJ.
But this case has really soured me to the whole idea. I still might wind up in North Carolina, but the idea of moving into an old house in Durham and fixing it up is pretty much by the boards. Who wants to move into a jurisdiction that is so hostile?
This case does not fit their agenda. They will ignore it.
The ACLU only pursues cases that advance the agenda.
This case does not fit their agenda. They will ignore it.
The ACLU only pursues cases that advance the agenda.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.