Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin

I don't even think that hair was on her. I think it's one they found in the bathroom.
___________________________________________________

Sometimes it is just so clear when someone is grasping a straws like in this case. Hair evidence is meaningless in this case. Nifong must either:

1. Have injuries consistent with a foreign object.

2. DNA from sexual fluids.

Or this case is going nowhere at all.


101 posted on 05/08/2006 6:27:37 PM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: JLS

He sure doesn't have Number 2.

And I have never bought the broom thing.

They aren't charged with sodomy.


102 posted on 05/08/2006 6:28:56 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: JLS

I haven't heard anyone explain away the injuries and behavior the rape nurse said were consistent with rape. The behavior could be explained away by this woman being a nut, but where did the injuries come from? Could they be self-inflicted?


185 posted on 05/09/2006 2:42:50 AM PDT by PeoplesRepublicOfWashington (Enhance Capitol security: Censure Cynthia!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

To: JLS
Nifong must have went aboard the Mother ship to find ways to keep his case alive. He will look for anything that sticks and if his behavior is consistent with what we have seen, he will create evidence to strengthen his case.

Just as the accuser, Nifong will change his story to suit his case.

How in the world was Nifong reelected?
300 posted on 05/09/2006 7:24:28 PM PDT by jonrick46
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson