Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE …Is coming national ID 'mark of the beast'?
WND ^ | May 5 06 | Ron Strom

Posted on 05/05/2006 7:21:22 AM PDT by churchillbuff

Is the national ID card the next step toward the imposition of the biblical "mark of the beast" Christians believe will be required to buy and sell during the Last Days?

That's the contention of a growing group of believers who are working to turn back the approval of the Real ID Act by Congress last year. Public Law 109-13 requires the national ID portion of the plan go into effect by May 2008.

"There is a prophecy in the Bible that foretells a time when every person will be required to have a mark or a number, without which he or she will not be able to participate in the economy," states the Christian website NoNationalID.com. "The prophecy is 2,000 years old, but it has been impossible for it to come to pass until now. With the invention of the computer and the Internet, this prophecy of buying and selling, using a number, can now be implemented at any time. Has the time for the fulfillment of this prophecy arrived?"

The site asks visitors to sign an online petition vowing not to vote for any candidate who does not commit to repealing the Real ID Act.

The goal, states the site, which is sponsored by Endtime Ministries, is to get 100,000 signatures on the petition.

On the site is a link to purchase a DVD entitled "666 – How Close? Will the National ID Become the Mark of the Beast?"

Americans choosing not to carry a national ID, the site warns, will be prohibited from driving a car, boarding a plane, train or bus, entering any federal building, opening a bank account, or possibly from holding a job.

"This is probably our last chance to head off the mechanism before it is actually implemented as the mark," states the site in the FAQ section. "It truly may be now or never."

The Real ID Act requires states to participate in a federal data-sharing program when issuing driver's licenses, making those licenses de facto national ID cards.

Touted as a tool of the war on terrorism, the ID card provision of the law, which also includes border-security measures, has attracted the most negative attention.

After May 11, 2008, "a federal agency may not accept, for any official purpose, a driver's license or identification card issued by a State to any person unless the State is meeting the requirements" specified in the Real ID Act. While states can issue non-federal ID cards, they would not be accepted by the Transportation Security Administration for travel purposes, grounding those who don't carry federally approved cards.

The data required to be included in each card are, among other things, the person's full legal name, date of birth, gender, driver's license number, a digital photo, the person's address and machine-readable technology so the information can be ready easily by government or banking personnel.

Each state must agree to share the data on the cards with every other state.

Supporters of the law say it does not require a "national" ID card because each state issues its own cards, not the federal government. But detractors note the cards are virtual national IDs since the federal law has dictated what data must be included and that each state must share its database with the others.

The New Hampshire Senate yesterday voted to reject a bill to rebel against the Real ID system and not participate in a pilot program for which the state had been tapped. The state House of Representatives passed the measure last month, but the Senate instead voted to study the driver's license requirements.

U.S. Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., is urging his home state to give Real ID a try, saying it's needed to keep terrorists and illegal aliens from entering the country.

According to the Manchester Union Leader, Gregg argues that New Hampshire residents will find it difficult to get on airplanes or enter federal buildings if New Hampshire doesn't embrace Real ID.

Groups opposed to the Real ID Act are making strange bedfellows, with Christians like those running NoNationalID.com fighting on the same side with the American Civil Liberties Union, which sponsors the website RealNightmare.org.

The ACLU site decries the fact that a motor vehicles department staff person will be required to ask for immigration-status papers from those applying for driver's licenses.

"REAL ID will inevitably cause discrimination against U.S. citizens who may 'look' or 'sound' foreign to a DMV bureaucrat," states the site. "REAL ID requires DMV employees to decide whether someone is a citizen or foreigner before issuing a driver's license. The law demands that DMV bureaucrats distinguish among citizens, permanent resident immigrants and other non-citizens in deciding who is eligible for a license and what type of license may be issued.

"Based on past experience when similar requirements were imposed on employers, widespread discrimination resulted against citizens who 'looked' or 'sounded' foreign."

The civil-liberties group also slams a requirement of the law that some immigrants be issued a temporary "tier-two" license that has a prominent expiration date.

U.S. governors also have come out against the law, saying it is a huge unfunded mandate imposed on the nation's states.

The National Conference of State Legislatures is equally opposed to the Real ID Act, saying, "Federal legislators and rule makers are negating state driver's license security efforts, imposing difficult-to-comply-with mandates and limiting their flexibility to address new concerns as they arise. In other words, decades of state experience is being substituted for a 'command and control regime' from a level of government that has no driver's license regulatory experience."

Endtime Ministries' Irvin Baxter, a radio host, believes the national ID is a precursor to the forced embedding of radio-frequency chips under the skin.

Baxter told the Concord, N.H., Monitor: "That's where we are headed right now. The prophecy states that you will have to receive a mark on your hand or in your forehead."


TOPICS: Conspiracy
KEYWORDS: 666; abledanger; chamberlainbuff; churchilldistruptor; lhudesingcuccu; libertarians; nationalidcard; puppetmasters; realid; realidact; rfid; tagging; tinfoilhat; verichip; wardchurchillbuff
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-468 next last
To: BlueStateDepression
You're a real piece of work.

Paypahz Pleahz!

321 posted on 05/08/2006 7:33:23 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: BlueStateDepression
Government by its very nature is abusive and seeks control.

This is why the Founding Fathers, (in trheir wisdom), strictly limited the power and authority of government.

I highly recommend you obatin a copy of "The Federalist Papers" and read it carefully. See how the brilliant men who gave us our republic felt about the exponential propensity of governments to expand their control over the citizenry, and why they put severe limits on what this one can do.

Your safety and security chimera is irrelevant. Liberty is more important than safety or catching even the worst criminals. I'm responsible for my own safety and security, thanks to the wisdom of the Second Amendment. Maybe you should be too, instead of looking to your lord god and master, the Almighty State.
322 posted on 05/08/2006 7:40:51 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred

If Franklin, Adams, Madison, and Jefferson would be against the Patriot Act, and I'm almost positive they would be, then so am I.

I could care less about the dangers we face. I know we live in dangerous times. So did they, and facing them as unfettered and unmonitored free men was more crucial to them than security.

I'd rather die in a terrorist attack as a FREE man than live under anything that even hints at a scintilla of an iota of totaltarianism. Besides, do you really TRUST Hitlery Rotten Clinton to use discretion with the broad powers of the USAPATRIOT Act if by some misfortune she ever ends up as Commandress in Chief?

I sure as H-E-Double-Hockey-Sticks don't.


323 posted on 05/08/2006 7:50:41 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 287 | View Replies]

To: Quix
"Gentlemen, we can make him better than he was before..."


diht-diht-diht-diht....."
324 posted on 05/08/2006 7:54:50 AM PDT by Crispus Attucks Patriot (The first to give his life for your liberty was a Black man!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
Never mind that the day will happen when God wants it to, not based on a petition drive.

Which is what IMO makes the Left Behind series so unbelievable, right at the outset. The Rapture has occurred, and the "prophetic clock" is now inexorably counting down the final seven years. Our protagonists form the "Tribulation Force", actually thinking they can alter, delay, or even interrupt the prophetically-forecasted chain of events. Why would they want to do that now? Why would they think they can? If the Antichrist can be stopped (or even merely delayed), wouldn't that mean that the prophesies are made false by their actions?

325 posted on 05/08/2006 7:55:21 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 320 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
You read them?

OK, I read some of them.

The point we are both making here, a bit more clearly said, is like many Christians, they deny God's sovereignty.

326 posted on 05/08/2006 8:40:35 AM PDT by Gamecock (Never confuse your Justification with your Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
As with everything else in pop Christianity, even the Left Behind series has spawned a commercial market:


327 posted on 05/08/2006 9:03:38 AM PDT by Gamecock (Never confuse your Justification with your Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
As with everything else in pop Christianity, even the Left Behind series has spawned a commercial market

Those are, I believe, a bootleg of an actual product. IIRC the real product has "Matthew 5:39" embroidered on the right side.

328 posted on 05/08/2006 9:16:44 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock

Y'know - a disturbing thought just occured to me about those shorts. Do they have a UPC barcode on the price tag?


329 posted on 05/08/2006 9:55:38 AM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy

ROTFLMBO!!!


330 posted on 05/08/2006 11:45:44 AM PDT by Frumanchu (quod erat demonstrandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock; Alex Murphy
I still want to market the Reformed alternative to the bumper sticker...

In case of rapture this car will be abandoned...but don't get any ideas, I'm coming right back

Or...

In case of rapture, look up...I'm on my way back down with a can of holy whoop-***

331 posted on 05/08/2006 11:50:12 AM PDT by Frumanchu (quod erat demonstrandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu; Gamecock
Years and years ago, I read an ad (IIRC in the Wittenberg Door's "truth is stranger than fiction" section) for a rapture "safety device" that you could install on your car's drivetrain/steering system. In case of rapture, the device would (somehow) slow down and gently steer your now-unmanned car to the side of the road and out of traffic, the idea being that if you're concerned about your loved ones being "left behind" in the still-moving vehicle, buying and installing the device would ease your conscience (for failing to convert them in time, presumably).

I don't recall whether it also shifted the transmission into park/neutral, engaged the emergency brake and shut off the ignition, but I would hope so. Otherwise, poor old heathen Aunt Martha would die from collision with a cow, instead of collision with that other Christian's car - you know, the one whose owner unconscionably failed to purchase and install a safety device on his car beforehand.

332 posted on 05/08/2006 12:36:01 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 331 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
Saved Premillenialist Christians Shouldn't Drive
333 posted on 05/08/2006 1:07:31 PM PDT by Gamecock ("False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel." Machen predicting Osteen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: Frumanchu

To 333, half way to the beast and counting....


334 posted on 05/08/2006 1:08:26 PM PDT by Gamecock ("False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel." Machen predicting Osteen)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: Gamecock
To 333, half way to the beast and counting....

....All the mid-tribbers have now left the thread....

335 posted on 05/08/2006 1:19:01 PM PDT by Alex Murphy (Colossians 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 334 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy
There are several improvements that could be made, such as tuning the radio to a predetermined foreknown Christian station, and "Four Spiritual Laws" pamphlets that pop out of the ashtrays.
336 posted on 05/08/2006 1:25:30 PM PDT by Frumanchu (quod erat demonstrandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 332 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
Is coming national ID 'mark of the beast'?

I thought the SSAN number was the Mark of the Beast.
No, it was the bar codes.
No, it was …
337 posted on 05/08/2006 1:30:58 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alex Murphy; Gamecock
Silly me...the radio stations would all be unmanned. You would have to have it set up to play a CD hidden somewhere in the car.

Song suggestions include Jesus, Take the Wheel by Carrie Underwood

(in the event of a failure in the slowing mechanism, the theme from Benny Hill is recommended)

338 posted on 05/08/2006 1:32:54 PM PDT by Frumanchu (quod erat demonstrandum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 336 | View Replies]

To: churchillbuff
How did they get to name it the "Patriot Act," anyway …

Bills (and subsequent laws) are given names that will help ensure their passage. In this case, any one who voted against the “Patriot Act” must be un-American. The same happened to bills labeled with the tag “Children’s” (must hate children), or other such names that make it difficult to vote against them.
339 posted on 05/08/2006 1:37:28 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: rattrap

I am not for a forced microchip either, unless of course the context is convisted felons out on parole that limits their movement.


340 posted on 05/09/2006 6:31:22 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 270 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 301-320321-340341-360 ... 461-468 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson