To: jdm
While I agree with Jersey Republican Biker Chick about underwires, I see the point of the lady in the article. The sheriff should have a female staffer available to wand women. I don't want some slack-jawed yahoo wanding me or my daughter, especially if he is doing so in a lascivious manner.
7 posted on
05/04/2006 6:41:48 AM PDT by
mouse_35
To: mouse_35
The sheriff should have a female staffer available to wand women. I don't want some slack-jawed yahoo wanding me or my daughter, especially if he is doing so in a lascivious manner.Well, of course if he or she is unprofessional, then complain. But one deputy of either sex costs at least twice as one deputy of generic unspecified sex. Something is going to give somewhere. I don't know what a deputy costs per year, but it ain't trivial, once you equip, train, insure, clothe, and so forth. And we have three and sometimes four courtrooms running, with different access routes. So it gets expensive.
18 posted on
05/04/2006 6:51:00 AM PDT by
Mad Dawg
(If you find yourself in a fair fight, you did not prepare properly.)
To: mouse_35
I was a Corrections Officer in a mens prison and is the metal detector was set off by a female visitor, a female officer was sent to do the pat frisk.
The fact that they say it is an underwire for the wanding was not enough. A pat frisk was always conducted.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson