Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The CFR and the Trilateral Commission - The two organizations that run the United States
unknown | Melvin Sickler

Posted on 05/02/2006 11:55:13 AM PDT by Marxbites

The Council on Foreign Relations And the Trilateral Commission - The two organizations that run the United States

There are two groups of elite men and women in particular that most American people do not know about, but which are a clear threat and danger to the freedom of the American people. These are the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral Commission.

Right now the United States is completely under the control of those who run these two organizations (David Rockefeller in particular). It is therefore important to understand these organizations if we wish to understand what has been taking place in the United States since the early 1900’s.

The resource material I am using that explains in depth what these two organizations are all about was written by Jack Newell and Devvy Kidd ("Why A Bankrupt America?", Project Liberty, P.O. Box 741075, Arvada, CO 80006-9075). Please allow me to share the main ideas with you.

Edward Mandell House The Council on Foreign Relations was founded in 1921 by Edward Mandell House, who had been the chief advisor of President Woodrow Wilson. Actually, he was more than just a prominent aide of the President; he dominated the President. He was referred to as Wilson’s "alter ego" (other self), and was credited for being the most powerful individual in the United States during the Wilson Administration from 1913 until 1921.

House was a Marxist whose goal was to socialize the United States. In 1912, House wrote the book "Philip Dru: Administrator" in which he stated that he was working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." In this book, House laid out a plan for the conquest of America, telling how both the Democratic and Republican Parties would be controlled, and be used as instruments in the creation of a socialistic government. And he asked for the establishment of a state-controlled central bank, which were both proposed in "The Communist Manifesto".

And it was in 1913, during the very first year of the House-dominated Wilson Administration, that both of these proposals became laws. The Federal Reserve Act was passed, which brought into power a private central bank to create the money of the United States, taking this power away from the United States Congress. And the 16th Amendment to the United States Constitution, the graduated income tax as proposed by Karl Marx, was also ratified.

The Council on Foreign Relations In 1921, House and his friends formed the Council on Foreign Relations whose purpose right from its conception was to destroy the freedom and independence of the United States, and to lead the country into a one-world government.

Right from its beginning, in 1921, the CFR began to attract men of power and influence. In the late 1920’s, important financing for the CFR came from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Carnegie Foundation. In 1940, at the invitation of President Roosevelt, members of the CFR gained domination over the State Department, and they have maintained this domination ever since. Its intentions The late Carroll Quigley (Bill Clinton’s mentor), Professor of History at Georgetown University, member of the CFR, stated in his book, "Tragedy & Hope":

"The CFR is the American Branch of a society which originated in England, and which believes that national boundaries should be obliterated, and a one-world rule established."

Rear Admiral Chester Ward, a former member of the CFR for 16 years, warned the American people of the organization’s intentions:

"The most powerful clique in these elitist groups have one objective in common — they want to bring about the surrender of the sovereignty of the national independence of the United States. A second clique of international members in the CFR comprises the Wall Street international bankers and their key agents. Primarily, they want the world banking monopoly from whatever power ends up in the control of global government."

And Dan Smoot, a former member of the FBI Headquarters staff in Washington, D.C., summarized the organization’s purpose as follows:

"The ultimate aim of the CFR is to create a one-world socialist system, and to make the U.S. an official part of it."

In other words, the CFR’s activities are treasonous to the U.S. Constitution. Their goal is to put an end to the United States of America, and to make the country a part of their global government scheme.

Its influence In 1944 and in 1948, the Republican candidate for President, Thomas Dewey, was a CFR member. In later years, Republicans Eisenhower and Nixon were members of the CFR, as were Democrats Stevenson, Kennedy, Humphrey, and McGovern. (Note: We believe Kennedy became disloyal to the CFR prior to his assassination.") The American people think that they have a choice when they vote for a President, but the truth of the matter is, with few exceptions: Presidential candidates for decades have been CFR members.

In one of the CFR’s annual reports, published in 1978, it listed a membership of 1878 members. Eleven of its members at this time were United States Senators, with even more Congressmen belonging to the organization. 284 of its members listed in this report were United States Government officials. And the Chairman of the Board of this immensely powerful pyramid was stated as being none other than David Rockefeller himself.

The CFR not only has its members in the United States Government, but its influence has also spread to other vital areas of American life. According to Newell:

"Its members have run, or are running, NBC and CBS, ‘The New York Times’, ‘The Washington Post’, ‘The Des Moines Register’, and many other important newspapers. The leaders of ‘Time’, ‘Newsweek’, ‘Fortune’, ‘Business Week’, and numerous other publications are CFR members. The organization’s members also dominate the academic world, top corporations, the huge tax-exempt foundations, labor unions, the military, and just about every segment of American life."

Barry Goldwater states in his book, "With No Apologies", on page 231:

"Does it not seem strange to you that these men just happened to be CFR and just happened to be on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, that absolutely controls the money and interest rates of this great country without benefit of Congress? A privately owned organization, the Federal Reserve, which has absolutely nothing to do with the United States of America!"

And Newell continues to write:

"Not every member of the CFR is fully committed to carrying out Edward Mandell House’s conspiratorial plan. Many have been flattered by an invitation to join a study group, which is what the CFR calls itself. Others go along because of personal benefits, such as a nice job and a new importance. But all are used to promote the destruction of U.S. sovereignty."

All aspects of American life are dominated The members of the CFR dominate almost every aspect of American life, yet most Americans have never even heard of the Council on Foreign Relations. One reason for this is probably because there are over 170 journalists, correspondents, and communications executives who are members of the CFR, and who do not write about the organization. Also, it is an express condition of membership that no one is to disclose what goes on at CFR meetings.

Congressmen John R. Rarick had warned:

"The CFR, dedicated to one-world government, financed by a number of the largest tax-exempt foundations, and wielding such power and influence over our lives in the areas of finance, business, labor, military, education, and mass communication-media, should be familiar to every American concerned with good government, and with preserving and defending the U.S. Constitution and our free-enterprise system. Yet, the nation’s right-to-know machinery, the news media, usually so aggressive in exposures to inform our people, remain conspicuously silent when it comes to the CFR, its members and their activities. “

"The CFR is the establishment. Not only does it have influence and power in key decision-making positions at the highest levels of government to apply pressure from above, but it also finances and uses individuals and groups to bring pressure from below, to justify the high level decisions for converting the U.S. from a sovereign Constitution Republic into a servile member of a one-world dictatorship."

The CFR now has its main headquarters at the corner of Park Avenue and 68th Street in New York City, in a building given to the organization by the Rockefeller family in 1929. Its main goal is still to create a one-world government by destroying the freedom and independence of all nations, especially the United States. And David Rockefeller continues to be its Chairman of the Board.

The Trilateral Commission Unfortunately, the Council on Foreign Relations is not the only group proposing an end to the sovereignty of the United States. In 1973, The Trilateral Commission was founded to work for the same goal: a one-world government.

The Trilateral Commission's roots stem from the book, "Between Two Ages", written by Zbigniew Brzezinski in 1970. In this book, Brzezinski praised Marxism, thought of the United States as obsolete, and praised the formation of a one-world government. His thinking closely parallels that of CFR founder Edward Mandell House.

Marxism On page 72, Brzezinski writes: "Marxism is simultaneously a victory of the external, active man over the inner, passive man and a victory of reason over belief."

On page 83, he states: "Marxism disseminated on the popular level in the form of Communism, represented a major advance in man's ability to conceptualize his relationship to his world."

On page 123, we find: "Marxism supplied the best available insight into contemporary reality."

What Mr. Brzezinski fails to tell his readers is that approximately 100 million human beings have been murdered under Marxism "in the form of Communism" just in this Twentieth Century. It has enslaved a billion more, and has been responsible for those who live in Communist-dominated countries. There is nothing like being brainwashed!

For world government Zbigniew Brzezinski's "Between Two Ages" was published in 1970 while he was a professor in New York City. David Rockefeller read the book and, in 1973, launched the new Trilateral Commission, whose purposes include linking North America, Western Europe, and Japan

"in their economic relations, their political and defense relations, their relations with developing countries, and their relations with Communist countries."

As Newell writes:

"The original literature of The Trilateral Commission also states, exactly as Brzezinski's book had proposed, that the more advanced Communist States could become partners in the alliance leading to world government. In short, David Rockefeller implemented Brzezinski's proposal."

Rockefeller appointed Zbigniew Brzezinski to be the Director of The Trilateral Commission.

Jimmy Carter In 1973, Jimmy Carter became a student of Brzezinski, and a founding member of the Trilateral Commission. On March 21, 1978, "The New York Times" featured an article about Zbigniew Brzezinski's close relationship with the President. In part, it reads:

"The two men met for the first time four years ago when Mr. Brzezinski was executive director of The Trilateral Commission… and had the foresight to ask the then obscure former Governor of Georgia to join its distinguished ranks. Their initial teacher-student relationship blossomed during the campaign, and appears to have grown closer still."

To think that the teacher in this relationship praised Marxism, and wanted to form a one-world government. And the student was to become the President of the United States. During the 1976 political campaign, Carter repeatedly told the nation that he was going to get rid of the Establishment Insiders if he became president. But when he took office, he promptly filled his Administration with members of the Council on Foreign Relations (284 to be exact) and The Trilateral Commission, the two most prominent insider organizations in America. Included in this list of members of The Trilateral Commission were Walter Mondale and Dr. Henry Kissinger.

Beginning with Jimmy Carter, all the recent presidents, including President Clinton, have promptly filled their administrations with members of the Council on Foreign relations and The Trilateral Commission.

The Effects The common everyday American citizen does not need to be told that there is a controlled government running the United States. But when we understand exactly what the Council on Foreign Relations and The Trilateral Commission are, and how its members hold key positions in the Government, it becomes all the more clear. As Newell writes:

"The effects of the Council on Foreign Relation and The Trilateral Commission on the affairs of our nation is easy to see. Our own Government no longer acts in its own interest, we no longer win any wars we fight, and we constantly tie ourselves to international agreements, pacts, and conventions. And, our leaders have developed blatant preferences for Communist U.S.S.R., Communist Cuba, and Communist China, while they continue to work for world government, which has always been the goal of Communism…”

"The real goal of our own Government’s leaders is to make the United States into a carbon copy of a Communist state, and then to merge all nations into a one-world system run by a powerful few."

Barry Goldwater once stated on this subject:

"The Trilateral Commission is international, and it is intended to be the vehicle for multinational consolidation of the commercial and banking interests by seizing control of the political government of the United States. The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power – political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical."

As with the CFR, not all the members of The Trilateral Commission are fully committed to the destruction of the United States. Some just go along for the ride, to obtain fame, comfortable living, and constant flattery. But some, of course, really do run things and some, of course, really do run things and work against the independence of the United States.

In conclusion The American people may think that they live in a free country when, in reality, things could not be more controlled. The American public must be made aware of what is really taking place in the united States.

The key to obtain our freedom, to have a true independence, is to free ourselves from the yoke of International Finance. How true it is to state that those who control the money of a country control everything in that country.

Every citizen of the United States should become informed about these inside organizations, and make it a point not to vote nor to promote those, who are members for these organizations. And to demand a reform of the financial laws of the country, especially to repeal the Federal Reserve Act of 1913, and to implement the philosophy of Social Credit into the laws of the country.


TOPICS: Conspiracy; History; Society
KEYWORDS: 109th; bush; cfr; communism; communists; globalism; globalists; iran; iraq; israel; jbsthinksyourenuts; marxism; rockefeller; socialism; socialists; tinfoil; trilateralcommission
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last
To: GSlob

And Xenu and the body phaetons. They were omitted too.


101 posted on 05/02/2006 2:45:20 PM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: gondramB
But you'll notice that foreign policy changes more on the party in chanrge than whether they are CFR. So I don't think there is a whole lot of stage management.

True, there are differences, but I think those differences may be considerably less than what's suggested by the rhetoric. Most of us here remember during the 2004 campaign how this place was abuzz over the fact that in 1998, a number of Democrats (including Kerry) had petitioned Clinton to go into Iraq to disarm Saddam. I really think that if Gore had won the 2000 election, we most likely would still have gone into Iraq following 9/11, much as the Democrats like to bash Bush for having done so. There would have been differences in how exactly the operations were carried out, but probably not in the overall game plan.

102 posted on 05/02/2006 2:50:22 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

Well, to be considered an obligatory part in every conspiracy one needs to develop a distinguished reputation first. Similar to what would be needed to be invited to every formal state dinner at WH - it is not for all and sundry to get on that list.


103 posted on 05/02/2006 2:52:08 PM PDT by GSlob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan
I am not saying House is a great guy. Many or most of his ideas were quite stupid. I am saying he was not a Marxist, as claimed by the stupid article.

Actually you were saying more than that. You were defending his views on the war and implying that anyone who disagreed was motivated by pro-German sentiment.

I don't know for sure myself if he was a Marxist. Although he very much fits the profile of a Fabian Socialist.

104 posted on 05/02/2006 2:56:14 PM PDT by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: GSlob

An excellent point. One wonders have many years a poor conspiracy must languish on the lunatic fringe before it is eventually deemed 'respectable.'


105 posted on 05/02/2006 2:57:15 PM PDT by Gulf War One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Gulf War One

It is gaining respectability as real historians revise the progressive glut we've been spoonfed for almost 100years.

Have you not heard just how terrible and in many cases anti-American so many history texts actually are - being they are selected by the liberal cabal that is state education?


106 posted on 05/02/2006 3:02:39 PM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites

The CFR is a powerful think tank. Nothing more. It does influence policy, so the Russians had common sense to penetrate it and steer it left. I believe that a quarter of the CFR members are actually agents of foreign nations (Russia, mostly, but there are some Chinese agents too).


107 posted on 05/02/2006 3:36:10 PM PDT by Thunder90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites
Is HE a tinfoil hat candidate like yourselves?

I'm wearing a tinfoil hat just because I posted another article from this author? You are too funny.

108 posted on 05/02/2006 3:53:56 PM PDT by Jean S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gondramB; dighton; JeanS; Senator Bedfellow; hellinahandcart; BlueLancer; Dog Gone; Billthedrill

Yours is a woefully incomplete chart. No mention of Rotary International, Knights of Columbus or (your biggest mistake) Don King.


109 posted on 05/02/2006 4:36:12 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: aculeus

>>Yours is a woefully incomplete chart. No mention of Rotary International, Knights of Columbus or (your biggest mistake) Don King.<


Shhh... For some of those you have to buy the newsletter. Now normally you need to be leve eight to be allowed to buy the newsletter but I'm willing to make an exception just for you. :)


110 posted on 05/02/2006 4:40:40 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Thunder90
Time after time the ones you see that actually identify their membership, all fit the leftist elitist mold - in the guise of saviors from our hapless selves. 100 years of progressive propaganda diffused throughout media, academe & govt has worked just as they planned, slowly, incrementally, with dashes of wars to expand spending rights. The periods of true growth, versus the inflation booms starting in the 20's, occured whenever govt taxed and regulated least.

In my lifetime; Kennedy, Reagan, Newt & W's cuts. Every time a systemic boom. But the Fed screws it all up so we can't really tell which cause equals what effect. By design I'd bet. Afterall, the Soros's of the world, those presumpters of power of his ilk, have silver arbitrages and the like to fashion when they decide it's time to cash out once again on the backs of average Americans who just want the cost of the elites using govt off their backs once again.

Some knuckleheads won't learn what really happened outside of govt textbooks at the beginning of a long run of vote buying power with opm given to congress by the judicial fiat of the FDR court. The ability for the first time to spend on special versus general interests such as a battleship which generally benefits all Americans equally. None of which would have been possible without the totally unaccountable, partly foreign owned, and uncontrollable inflation machine created in 1913 by banking interests, versus the interests of the people who were totally kept in the dark as to it's particulars.

Banking interests, especially including those from abroad who became the major shareholders with strong financial control and family ties to Wallstreet. The industrialists and cognicenti progressives were plain jealous of just how well their eurosocialist counterparts were accumulating power, and planning great societies for themselves with the new tool of socialism. From the lands that invented freedom, they near missed it completely, and what dear little is left, they are more than twice as close to the totalitarianism similar collectivism eventually brought them before!

It's as if for half the world, history never happened as it did. Unfortunately it takes decades sometimes to reveal the truths of an Alger Hiss and his other Kremlin directed cohorts within our Whitehouse, the UN, Soviet embassy & Hollywood that Venona fingered. SOB's that they might have been, McCarthy & HUAC eat Clooney's lunch on this one bigtime. We had the same subversives here that found weaker more traumatized and more extensively propagandized minds abroad.

My biggest fear is that a Jeb Hensarling (just on a while ago on the house floor-bless his little heart) who wants to revive the call back to limited govt, is about a day late and a dollar short. It should have been job one to rollback the New Deal and it's spawn en toto from day one. Where are the supreme court challenges now to the judicial fiat FDR's pre-stacked court kept rejecting routinely?

The founder's understood the corruptability of men, and the progressives have spent 100 years advancing them on the people's purse.
111 posted on 05/02/2006 8:10:06 PM PDT by Marxbites (Freedom is the negation of Govt to the maximum extent possible. Today, Govt is the economy's virus.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MeanWestTexan

Well, heck, since I'm an ethnic Jew (sephardic, no less) AND on the board of a couple of banks, you presumably already hate me.

Well, my o my, I thought you were an Episcopalian? (:^)


112 posted on 05/02/2006 8:13:50 PM PDT by miele man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: traditional1
Prisoner
113 posted on 05/03/2006 5:24:56 AM PDT by verity (The MSM is comprised of useless eaters)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: miele man

I was raised Jewish, even lived in Israel, but converted to Christianity in the Army.

Baptised in the sands of Saudi Arabia, ironically.

And Anglican, not Episcopalian.

(See my profile.)


114 posted on 05/03/2006 7:16:50 AM PDT by MeanWestTexan (Many at FR would respond to Christ "Darn right, I'll cast the first stone!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Marxbites; inquest; MeanWestTexan; gondramB; subterfuge; SE Mom

We know there are people who want to dissolve our national boundaries, with international courts, the UN, general anti-American sentiment, etc. So that’s not a question. And we know there are always demagogues and thieves who deceive in order to maintain power. And we know Marxist principles are increasingly prevalent in our government and in popular culture. These are known facts, not conspiracy theory.

So why the instant ridicule just because CFR is put under scrutiny?

There really are people who wear tin foil hats, and they are insane. We should acknowledge the clear distinction between insanity and rational vigilance that happens to be out of the mainstream.

Fear of appearing foolish might be a motivate to jump on the tin-hat-jokes bandwagon. The same thing was done with McCarthyism, it became a label, deterring people to some extent from vigilance against communism.


115 posted on 05/03/2006 5:53:54 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
>>So why the instant ridicule just because CFR is put under scrutiny? <<

It's not the scrutiny that causes the the ridicule. Scrutiny is good. I have criticisms of some CFR policies.

Where the ridicule tend to kick in is when people say things that are completely untrue (Like fantasy statements that the CFR is for open borders or is against national sovereignty) and then following it up with wild conspiracies about the CFR and Jews running the world.
116 posted on 05/03/2006 6:02:11 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I am aware that there are many officials in our government (I won’t mention the CFR) whose words and actions are consistent with a policy favoring open borders, against national sovereignty, and in fact in favor of Marxism. I agree the phrase “running the world” sounds radical, like a way to describe the power of a Roman Emperor. But having just the right amount of influence in just the right places regarding the Supreme Court, Congress, and agencies like the IRS, the Federal Reserve—I see how this kind of power could be the current day equivalent.


117 posted on 05/03/2006 6:18:19 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
>>I am aware that there are many officials in our government (I won’t mention the CFR) whose words and actions are consistent with a policy favoring open borders, against national sovereignty, and in fact in favor of Marxism. I agree the phrase “running the world” sounds radical, like a way to describe the power of a Roman Emperor. But having just the right amount of influence in just the right places regarding the Supreme Court, Congress, and agencies like the IRS, the Federal Reserve—I see how this kind of power could be the current day equivalent.<<


The CFR has been trying for 6 years to get tough border security passed. The homeland security department adopted their plan but they can't even get a vote on it in congress much less get it passed - they clearly are not in the Roman Emporer power category yet.
118 posted on 05/03/2006 6:26:30 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: gondramB

I’m convinced it’s not an all-or-none phenomenon. Surely the CFR is not 100% saturated with Marxists. But neither is its membership free of them.


119 posted on 05/03/2006 6:38:24 PM PDT by reasonisfaith (Leftists will never stand up like men and fight for their true beliefs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

>>I’m convinced it’s not an all-or-none phenomenon. Surely the CFR is not 100% saturated with Marxists. But neither is its membership free of them.<<

Well, some conservatives would call Jimmy Carter and Bill Clinton marxists but I've known real marxists - there is a world of difference.


120 posted on 05/03/2006 6:40:09 PM PDT by gondramB (He who angers you, in part, controls you. But he may not enjoy what the rest of you does about it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-207 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson