"Only one portion of the DMCA was related to the UN and it's now obviously contrary to their current goals. "
Spin, spin, spin. It's UN law, implemented with your blessing. Of course, you love all things "one world" just like Microsoft money for China and Planned Parenthood.
"it's now obviously contrary to their current goals. "
Ha! They haven't repealed the WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act, have they? That's the model for the DMCA, you know, right? Did we just lie again?
And as for condeming the WIPO, I was expressing my disgust with them as you argued against me, earlier, lying about DMCA not being UN law, etc.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1620494/posts?page=163#163
So, lie again if you want, but the facts once again don't line up with your version of reality.
Correction to the above...Instead of "WIPO Copyright and Performances and Phonograms Treaties Implementation Act", that should read "WIPO Performances and Phonograms Treaty".
The treaty was the model for DMCA. The Implementation Act was where we actually sold out our sovereignty to the UN and WIPO, with the full backing of GE.
LOL there's not even such a thing. If there was, we'd all have to use open source now since that's what they are pushing, along with you of course.
"one world"
Which is why they suppport open source now, a software world without borders, just like you. Proprietary software puts up too many borders for you guys, known as "ownership".