Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JLS
They don't get to argue that. They can either prove the time stamps were altered or the can not. From what I gather it is easy enough to digital images are altered if they were.

Modern cameras store EXIF header information in the image file. Examples of stored information are shutter speed, date and time, focal length, exposure compensation, metering pattern, make and model of camera used to take the picture, and if a flash was used. It's impossible to alter these, unless the image was run through an image editor, where the EXIF header information is stripped once the image is altered in the image editor. To have an accurate time stamp, the camera's date and time would have to be set correctly, and the original unaltered image would have to be submitted as evidence.

You can learn all you ever wanted to learn about EXIF header data here.

622 posted on 04/28/2006 1:08:32 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper (There is no alternative to the GOP except varying degrees of insanity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 526 | View Replies ]


To: BigSkyFreeper

If a cell phone can transmitt a photo realtime or delayed, then there could be irrefutable

evidence that it was not tampered with, if the received photo is stored in another device.

Also, phone company might have record of such file transmission and time for billing purposes.

I do not know, and in the end it won't matter anyway.


629 posted on 04/28/2006 1:55:32 AM PDT by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson