Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper

If a cell phone can transmitt a photo realtime or delayed, then there could be irrefutable

evidence that it was not tampered with, if the received photo is stored in another device.

Also, phone company might have record of such file transmission and time for billing purposes.

I do not know, and in the end it won't matter anyway.


629 posted on 04/28/2006 1:55:32 AM PDT by xoxoxox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 622 | View Replies ]


To: xoxoxox
If you're thinking of possibilities, try this one:

Photo taken but not sent. Phone taken back to dorm and photo downloaded via docking station, edited, then edited photo uploaded back to phone.

Just a thought.

1,651 posted on 05/14/2006 12:00:58 AM PDT by rvoitier ("News is what's suppressed. Everything else is advertising.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 629 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson