[Howlin]

Alibi photos for lacrosse players questioned
Prosecutors reportedly claim prints were doctored, don't show correct time


The photos in question was taken, defense sources say, at approximately 12:41 a.m. and shows the accuser calmly being helped into a car to leave the party. Along with other time-stamped photos from earlier in the evening, defense attorneys will claim that there wasn't enough time for a rape to take place.

But prosecutors will argue, that photo actually shows the accuser being dropped off at the party, not leaving it, and that it was taken well before midnight. Prints taken from digital cell phone cameras have time stamps, but can be altered, digital photography experts told Time. Only the cameras themselves have true embedding time date to correspond with photos taken.



http://msnbc.msn.com/id/12521096/

[Carling]

Can phone calls be faked? Can ATM receipts?

Nifong makes my blood boil.

[sinkspur]

Alibi photos for lacrosse players questioned

Are the phone records doctored too? What about the ATM receipts?

The DA is desperate. Only, how does he explain the broomstick that the father referenced, when the AV and Kim never mentioned that a broomstick was used as a rape tool?

[JLS]

But prosecutors will argue, that photo actually shows the accuser being dropped off at the party,
__________________________________________________

They don't get to argue that. They can either prove the time stamps were altered or the can not. From what I gather it is easy enough to digital images are altered if they were.

[snarkytart]

Yes, this MSNBC story is a repeat of the TIME story. But how can they be arriving at 12:41am when Kim is recorded on the phone with the cops reporting a racial slur 14 minutes later at 12:53am. IF the prosecution moves the time line back they are really dumb.
I heard Abrams tore the TIME reporter a new one on his show tonight.