Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Word For The Day, Wednesday, April 26, 2006 - syncretism
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary ^ | 04/26/2006 | The Janitor

Posted on 04/26/2006 6:46:40 AM PDT by VRWCmember

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last
To: VRWCmember
I don't know if this one will work out, but I'll try:

"2. the fusion of two or more originally different inflectional forms"

Marriage is a form of syncretism even without children. One person makes the other person whole.

Call me Pollyanna if you so desire. LOL!

61 posted on 04/26/2006 9:47:17 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro

I've always loved that photo of McRhino! LOL!


62 posted on 04/26/2006 9:49:01 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember
". . . it is always a towel optional humpday.">P>And you were talking about my doule entendres yesterday, Vastie!
63 posted on 04/26/2006 9:54:49 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

"But you do VooDoo so well." Blazing Saddles.


64 posted on 04/26/2006 9:57:50 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: dixie sass

Nice, Dixie!


65 posted on 04/26/2006 9:59:15 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

Holy Moses, Truthie!


66 posted on 04/26/2006 10:03:18 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy; TheGrimReaper

That couldn't be Grimmy. The llama dude is nuts.


67 posted on 04/26/2006 10:12:56 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: tioga; martin_fierro

OMG! That is one fantastic, albeit awful, sycretism!


68 posted on 04/26/2006 10:15:06 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: theDentist
I guess there are no female doctors? And if someone is being beaten to death by another while the doctor is there, that he is bound NOT to report it.

Something is wrong here.

69 posted on 04/26/2006 10:19:58 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember; xsmommy; Slip18; RikaStrom; Dutchgirl; Knitting A Conundrum; tioga; EsmeraldaA; ...
Hi Vastie!

Excellent word. I'll try to do it justice:

There seems to be a huge and deeply gaping schism
With more than a little help from syncretism
From the Sixties "Freak Brothers" Free Wheelin' Franklin
And his then in-depth Modernism
"Dope will get you though times of no money
Better than money will get you through times of no dope!"

Culturally, the country was just stating to slide down the ropes
To recent Feng Shui Swamis, Crystal Creeps and oddball assorted kin
Looking through a glass and darkly
It's slowly becoming much clearer to see
That for relief of the problems of the Here and Now
Just chant: "That was Zen and this is Tao!"

Jack Deth~ 04/26/06.

70 posted on 04/26/2006 10:20:28 AM PDT by Jack Deth (Knight Errant and Disemboweler of the WFTD Thread)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

Now that's more like it!


71 posted on 04/26/2006 10:20:32 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Slip18
Holy Moses, Truthie!

I'm not making it up. Clinton's "use" of the sink in the Oval Office is a matter of pubic public record.

72 posted on 04/26/2006 10:31:07 AM PDT by TruthShallSetYouFree (Abortion is to family planning what bankruptcy is to financial planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: VRWCmember

The cat did it, I swear. What an ugly post.


73 posted on 04/26/2006 10:36:44 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: TruthShallSetYouFree

I couldn't read the stuff about Clinton. He disgusted me so much. I just knew he was "crooked" in many different ways. He's still disgusting.


74 posted on 04/26/2006 10:39:36 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Jack Deth
"Just chant: "That was Zen and this is Tao!"

Dark humor today, Jack? Still very good, though.

75 posted on 04/26/2006 10:41:58 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy; Slip18

All I can say is: if a doctor doesn't want to prticipate in such activities, he/she should not be forced to. But any invasive procedure should be at very least overseen by a medical professional.


76 posted on 04/26/2006 11:08:00 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: theDentist

there are plenty of doctors who will perform any procedure for anyone with the cash or the insurance coverage. those who want such a procedure can surely find someone to do it without obligating anyone to violate their religious beliefs whatever they may be. Suing in this instance was clearly a publicity ploy.


77 posted on 04/26/2006 11:13:42 AM PDT by xsmommy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy

yes


78 posted on 04/26/2006 11:24:56 AM PDT by theDentist (Qwerty ergo typo : I type, therefore I misspelll.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: theDentist; xsmommy
Medical malpractice is a big deal in CA. A lot of attorneys "major" in it. One such firm I remember very well was a brother and sister who were both doctors. They became attorneys. Voila. They made more money being medical mal attorneys than they ever could make being doctors.

Also in CA are a lot of the boobmakers and nose fixers, liposuction and that kind of stuff. There is more money in those areas of expertise than a regular flipping heart surgeon or brain surgeon. And they get paid up front.

So it all comes down to money.

79 posted on 04/26/2006 11:40:22 AM PDT by Slip18
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: xsmommy
Suing in this instance was clearly a publicity ploy.

Especially since the treatment issue was in 1999, the case originally went to trial in 2003, and the appeals court unanimously ruled in December 2005 that the doctors can use the argument that their religious beliefs were the basis for their refusal to perform the procedure.

80 posted on 04/26/2006 11:53:53 AM PDT by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson