Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2nd Duke party dancer now questions doubts about accuser
Daily Comet & AP ^ | April 21, 2006 | ALLEN G. BREED

Posted on 04/21/2006 12:56:01 AM PDT by OakOak

Edited on 04/21/2006 2:52:00 AM PDT by Admin Moderator. [history]

At first, a stripper who performed at a Duke University lacrosse team party doubted the story of a colleague who told police she was dragged into a bathroom and raped.

Now, Kim Roberts isn't so sure.

"I was not in the bathroom when it happened, so I can't say a rape occurred - and I never will," Roberts told The Associated Press Thursday in her first on-the-record interview. But after watching defense attorneys release photos of the accuser, and upset by the leaking of both dancers' criminal pasts, she said she has to "wonder about their character."

"In all honesty, I think they're guilty," she said. "And I can't say which ones are guilty ... but somebody did something besides underage drinking. That's my honest-to-God impression."

Attorneys for the 46 players have aggressively proclaimed the players' innocence, citing DNA tests during a public campaign that has included describing and releasing photos from the party.

Those photos, the defense maintains, show the accuser was both injured and impaired when she arrived, and also support the claim that one of the two players who has been indicted would not have had enough time to participate in any assault before he left the party. The district attorney has said he also hopes to charge a third suspect in the case.

The attorneys claim Roberts at first told a member of the defense team that she did not believe the accuser's allegations. They say she has changed her story to gain favorable treatment in a criminal case against her. They note she also e-mailed a New York public relations firm, asking in her letter for advice on "how to spin this to my advantage."

"We believe ... her story has been motivated by her own self-interest," said attorney Bill Thomas, who represents one of the uncharged players. "I think that a jury will ultimately have to decide the question of her credibility."

Roberts, 31, was arrested on March 22 - eight days after the party - on a probation violation from a 2001 conviction for embezzling $25,000 from a photofinishing company in Durham where she was a payroll specialist, according to documents obtained by the AP.

On Monday, the same day a grand jury indicted lacrosse players Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty, a judge agreed to a change so that Roberts would no longer have to pay a 15 percent fee to a bonding agent. District Attorney Mike Nifong signed a document saying he would not oppose the change.

"It seems she is receiving very favorable financial treatment for what she is now saying," Thomas said.

Mark Simeon, Roberts' attorney, said the bond conditions were changed because Roberts is not considered a flight risk. Nifong, who hasn't spoken with reporters about the case in weeks, didn't return a call seeking comment.

Roberts' testimony could be vital during any trial of the two sophomores, indicted on charges of first-degree rape, sexual offense and kidnapping.

Other than lacrosse players and the accuser, a 27-year-old student at a nearby university, Roberts is believed to be the only other person at the March 13 party.

Roberts said Thursday she does not remember Seligmann's face, but said she recalls seeing Finnerty - whom she described as the "little skinny one."

"I was looking him right in the eyes," she said.

Although she would not talk extensively about the party, she confirmed some of what the other dancer told police - including that the women initially left the party after one of the players threatened to sodomize the women with a broomstick.

The players' attorneys have said their clients were angry and demanded a refund when the women stopped dancing, but Roberts disputed that.

"They ripped themselves off when they started hollering about a broomstick," she said.

The accuser told police that the women were coaxed back into the house with an apology, at which point they were separated. That's when she said she was dragged into a bathroom and raped, beaten and choked for a half hour.

Later, police received a 911 call from a woman complaining that she had been called racial slurs by white men gathered outside the home where the party took place. The defense has said it believes the second dancer at the party made that call.

Roberts then drove the accuser - whom she reportedly had just met that night - to a grocery store and asked a security guard to call 911. The accuser was described later by a police officer as "just passed-out drunk."

The defense timeline is backed up by a cab driver who said Seligmann called for a ride at 12:14 a.m., and was picked up five minutes later. The defense argues that if the dancers were performing around midnight, Seligmann would not have had enough time to participate in the 30-minute assault described by the accuser.

The cabbie, Moez Mostafa, also said he saw a woman leaving the party in anger, and overheard someone say, "She just a stripper. She's going to call the police."

"She looked, like, mad," he said of the woman. "In her face, the way she walked, the way she talked, she looked like mad."

On Thursday, authorities released warrants detailing their search earlier this week of Finnerty's dorm room. Seized during the search were a newspaper article and an envelope addressed to Finnerty.

Also Thursday, 5W Public Relations, a New York firm that specializes in "crisis communication," distributed an e-mail signed "The 2nd Dancer," and Roberts confirmed she sent it after learning the AP knew her identity.

"I've found myself in the center of one of the biggest stories in the country," she wrote. "I'm worried about letting this opportunity pass me by without making the best of it and was wondering if you had any advice as to how to spin this to my advantage."

Ronn Torossian, 5W's president, said he replied, but got no response.

"If this person is indeed who they say they are, I would be happy to speak with her," said Torossian, whose firm has represented the likes of Sean "Diddy" Combs, Ice Cube and Lil' Kim.

Roberts, like the accuser a divorced single mother who is black, took umbrage at the notion that she should not try to make something out of her experience. She's worried that once her name and criminal record are public, no one will want to hire her.

"Why shouldn't I profit from it?" she asked. "I didn't ask to be in this position ... I would like to feed my daughter."

Roberts is bracing for an all-out attack, but said she's almost past caring.

"Don't forget that they called me a damn n####," she said. "She (the accuser) was passed out in the car. She doesn't know what she was called. I was called that. I can never forget that."


BLOCKBUSTER !! KIM's a GEM !!

Roberts, 31, was arrested on March 22 - eight days after the party - on a probation violation from a 2001 conviction for embezzling $25,000 from a photofinishing company in Durham where she was a payroll specialist, according to documents obtained by the AP.


TOPICS: Local News
KEYWORDS: da; dancer; duke; dukelax; durham; lacrosse; lax; rape
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,601-1,619 next last
To: Alia
From the brother's page ...


141 posted on 04/21/2006 4:31:11 AM PDT by maggief ( ... and YOU know what I'm talkin' about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 138 | View Replies]

To: OakOak
Roberts, 31, was arrested on March 22 - eight days after the party - on a probation violation from a 2001 conviction for embezzling $25,000 from a photofinishing company in Durham where she was a payroll specialist, according to documents obtained by the AP.

On Monday, the same day a grand jury indicted lacrosse players Reade Seligmann and Collin Finnerty, a judge agreed to a change so that Roberts would no longer have to pay a 15 percent fee to a bonding agent. District Attorney Mike Nifong signed a document saying he would not oppose the change.

The DA may as well pay his witnesses. It looks like he did.

142 posted on 04/21/2006 4:35:00 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

Bissey???



http://72.14.203.104/search?q=cache:NmQkZvGkEfIJ:www.myspace.com/36076219+%22Jason+Bissey%22+durham&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=3&client=firefox-a


143 posted on 04/21/2006 4:35:10 AM PDT by maggief ( ... and YOU know what I'm talkin' about.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Dang! You are on a roll.


144 posted on 04/21/2006 4:36:11 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: OakOak

"with visions of settlment-splitting dancing in her head"


145 posted on 04/21/2006 4:37:18 AM PDT by NonValueAdded ("Too soon to remember??? How about TOO SOON TO FORGET!" from Mr. Silverback)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

"While Mostafa waited at the curb, a woman in jeans and a sweater came from an alley beside the house and got into the driver's seat of a car parked in front of his taxi."

BAM!! There it is!!! Kim changed clothes!


146 posted on 04/21/2006 4:39:46 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Bissey must smoke outside 24/7 to observe the house next door so much. He also keeps adding details to his story.


147 posted on 04/21/2006 4:39:51 AM PDT by Carolinamom (Daily legal immigrant to FreeRepublic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Very interesting timing.

Curious, what does a photofinishing company do?


148 posted on 04/21/2006 4:40:01 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: maggief

So Bissey had a view of the two woman talking to each other at the rear of the house before going inside.

He also overheard conversations and saw the incident in which the two women drove away.

One would think then that Bissey is likely to have seen whatever happened at the rear of the house with the AV on the back porch, falling down, passing out and being carried to the car.

In which case he would be a key witness for the defense that the AV did not in fact re-enter the house when she went back for her shoe, and therefore was not raped in the bathroom after 12:30.

The case as to whether any rape could have occurred at all will then come down to whether Kim will testify that she was indeed with the AV in the bathroom during the earlier time, 12:04 to 12:30, and whether the defense has photos or video establishing that the two women went into the bathroom together. (And what cellphone records of the two women show.)

This is the best avenue for the defense to go to try to clear all the guys' names.


149 posted on 04/21/2006 4:40:34 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Raycpa

You can upload your photos to an online photo finishing site or drop them off at a brick & mortar store and they can print your images on photo paper


150 posted on 04/21/2006 4:45:30 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Bissey doesn't like the lax guys. He's going to color his testimony in favor of the prosecution.


151 posted on 04/21/2006 4:46:44 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Tony McDevitt may now get fingered as rapist no. 3, now that the AV and her hustlers know that he was at the party until the end.

Especially if they can figure out whether he made the "she's just a stripper" comment.


152 posted on 04/21/2006 4:47:49 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: maggief

BBl.


153 posted on 04/21/2006 4:48:45 AM PDT by happinesswithoutpeace (You are receiving this broadcast as a dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies]

To: Peach

Teenager in Durham, arrested for murder, gets $50,000 bond but the lacrosse players got a $400,000 bond.

http://www.heraldsun.com/durham/4-726291.html


154 posted on 04/21/2006 4:49:33 AM PDT by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: Jezebelle

He may not like his neighbors, but I would not at all assume that he is likely to perjure himself.


155 posted on 04/21/2006 4:49:37 AM PDT by SirJohnBarleycorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: maggief

But I thought the cabbie picked the guys up like two blocks from the house? What's the cabbie doing in front of the house?


156 posted on 04/21/2006 4:50:08 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: Peach

I wonder if she was doing her own photofinishing for "nontraditional" photo's and receiving cash direct for them.


157 posted on 04/21/2006 4:51:55 AM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 150 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

The real culprit in this story is whoever used the epithet "nig@#r." Won't be too many years and perps who utter that word will be shot on sight...


158 posted on 04/21/2006 4:52:04 AM PDT by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Out and out perjury, probably not. But "forget" some things, yes. Portray things in a different light, yes.


159 posted on 04/21/2006 4:52:25 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: SirJohnBarleycorn

Is that for sure the third name?


160 posted on 04/21/2006 4:53:56 AM PDT by Jezebelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 1,601-1,619 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson