To: mlc9852
Last night on OReilly, there was a former prosecutor who had spoke with the local police who said they had witness statements supporting the charge that she was extremely intoxicated before going to the Duke party.
He also said that the police have other conflicting accounts that cast doubts on the credibility of the victim.
He is still in disbelief that charges were filed and said the only logical reason is political.
16 posted on
04/20/2006 7:04:18 AM PDT by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: HEY4QDEMS
Judge Napolitano on Fox TV yesterday was almost apoplectic about the case. Insisted it was political and disgraceful.
41 posted on
04/20/2006 7:16:42 AM PDT by
hershey
To: HEY4QDEMS
The other guy on O'Reilly said the reason that lawyers were telling the team members to not talk to police was that the DA was trying to coach her on which ones were there when she was there. As a result it looks like one of the guys who she fingered, probably wasn't at the party when she was there.
I wonder if some of the team could sue her for slander (after all their matriculation at Duke is probably over), and name the DA as a co-defendant, get access to his campaign emails and letters, and prove it's all political...
156 posted on
04/20/2006 8:01:12 AM PDT by
OrioleFan
(Republicans believe every day is July 4th, DemocRATs believe every day is April 15th. - Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson