I live in Iowa where really REALLY good highschool kids have been removed from the prom court and forbidden to play baseball just because a year old photo surfaced of them holding beer cans. If just a year old photo can change so much than just the fact that the lacrosse team team had a druken party with a stripper should ruin these college students. And NO means NO means NO! IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO OR WHAT A PERSON HAS DONE IN THE PAST! If the stripper said NO the guys should have backed off.
If just a year old photo can change so much than just the fact that the lacrosse team team had a druken party with a stripper should ruin these college students
No. It should not "ruin" these college students. We have a travesty of justice going on. Take up your problem with your High School's Prom in a separate thread, okay?
Preventing someone from attending their HS Prom is, shall we say, REALLY REALLY different from a FALSE ACCUSATION ruining the lives of some males who are innocent of rape.
Ya wanna talk morals? Be fair. Let's talk about the stripper's morals.
I think what the HS has done a hard thing, but appropriate. So, do you think the kids caught with 1 year old photos of them holding beer cans are going to be scarred for life? A false accusation?
You are presenting a false argument.
THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO EVIDENCE THAT ANY OF THESE BOYS LAID A HAND ON HER!!!!!!! NO means NO means NO does not apply here!
You would judge them so? Fit for ruin over a single dalience? You're scales are crooked.
And NO means NO means NO! IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO OR WHAT A PERSON HAS DONE IN THE PAST! If the stripper said NO the guys should have backed off.
They will prove their innocence at trial, though it is shameful that they must.
So let me get this straight! Because these young men were engaging in what you consider immoral behaviour, they deserve to be falsely convicted of rape???? If they are guilty of rape, of course they should be convicted, but where is the evidence of this crime?
There seems to be plenty of exculpatory evidence.